POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Pennsylvania Prohibits State Interference with Assisted Reproductive Technology

Original title: An Act protecting an individual's choice to use assisted reproductive technology.

Last action · June 18, 2026: Referred to HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, June 18, 2026Sponsors: Jenn O'Mara and 30 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Pennsylvania prohibits state government interference with an individual's choice to use medically appropriate , effective immediately upon enactment.

Why it matters

Residents seeking fertility treatments are guaranteed protection from state-level restrictions on procedures such as , while future laws passed by the General Assembly will automatically be subject to this protection unless explicitly exempted.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Individuals using assisted reproductive technology

The Commonwealth is prohibited from interfering with their choice to use medically appropriate assisted reproductive technology.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What specific fertility treatments are covered by this act?
The act covers treatments and laboratory procedures involving the handling of human oocytes or embryos to achieve pregnancy, explicitly including (IVF), (GIFT), and zygote intrafallopian transfer (ZIFT), among others.
Can future General Assemblies pass laws that restrict assisted reproductive technology?
Yes, but any future law enacted after this act will be subject to this restriction unless the General Assembly explicitly excludes that specific law by reference.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

11 actions
  1. Jun 18, 2026SenateCommittee
    Referred to HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, June 18, 2026
  2. Jun 18, 2026Senate
    In the Senate
  3. Jun 9, 2026HouseFloor
    Third consideration and final passage, June 9, 2026 (147-55)
  4. Jun 9, 2026HouseCommittee
    Re-reported as committed, June 9, 2026
  5. Jun 8, 2026House
    Re-committed to APPROPRIATIONS, June 8, 2026
  6. Jun 8, 2026HouseFloor
    Second consideration, June 8, 2026
Show 5 earlier actions
  1. Jun 3, 2026House
    Removed from table, June 3, 2026
  2. Apr 14, 2026House
    Laid on the table, April 14, 2026
  3. Apr 14, 2026HouseIntroduced
    First consideration, April 14, 2026
  4. Apr 14, 2026House
    Reported as amended, April 14, 2026
  5. Mar 10, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to HEALTH, March 10, 2025

Version history & redline

2 versions on file
Comparing Printer's No. 0866 → Printer's No. 3187
removed addedOfficial text
added: PRIOR PRINTER'S NO. 866 added: PRINTER'S NO. 3187 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL No. 836 Session of 2025 INTRODUCED BY O'MARA, MAYES, MALAGARI, KHAN, SANCHEZ, CERRATO, SCHLOSSBERG, ISAACSON, HILL-EVANS, PIELLI, HANBIDGE, MADDEN, CURRY, HOHENSTEIN, DONAHUE, HADDOCK, KENYATTA, D. WILLIAMS, DALEY, removed: DEASY added: DEASY, SHUSTERMAN AND removed: SHUSTERMAN, added: BOYD, MARCH 10, 2025 removed: REFERRED TO added: AS REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, removed: MARCH 10, 2025 added: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, AS AMENDED, APRIL 14, 2026 AN ACT Protecting an individual's choice to use assisted reproductive technology. The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows: Section […] human eggs or preembryos. The term includes in vitro fertilization embryo transfer, gamete intrafallopian transfer, pronuclear stage transfer, tubal embryo transfer and zygote intrafallopian removed: transfer.added: <--
Redline computed from the official version text (record lane).View this version →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Show 26 more sponsors

Connected Entities

Malcolm Kenyatta, Carol Hill-Evans, La'Tasha Mayes and 19 more
PersonMalcolm Kenyatta“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonCarol Hill-Evans“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonLa'Tasha Mayes“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonDan Williams“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonMary Isaacson“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonMary Jo Daley“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonSteve Malagari“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonGina Curry“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonJenn O'Mara“Primary sponsor of House Bill 836”Map →
PersonJim Haddock“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonDan Deasy“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonHeather Boyd“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonMike Schlossberg“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonTarik Khan“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonChris Pielli“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonMaureen Madden“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonKyle Donahue“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonLiz Hanbidge“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonMelissa Shusterman“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonJoe Hohenstein“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonMissy Cerrato“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonBen Sanchez“Cosponsor”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.palegis.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy80
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz50
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record