POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Massachusetts Senate Order authorizes study on labor and workforce development bills

Original title: Order relative to authorizing the joint committee on Labor and Workforce Development, to make an investigation and study of certain current Senate documents relative to labor and workforce development matters.

Last action · August 17, 2026: Discharged to the committee on Senate Rules

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

The Massachusetts on Labor and Workforce Development is authorized to conduct an investigation and study regarding multiple labor-related Senate documents.

Why it matters

Changes no state laws, creates no new programs, and appropriates no funds; it solely authorizes a committee study of pending labor petitions.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Joint Committee on Labor and Workforce Development

The committee is tasked with conducting the investigation and study of the referenced labor petitions.

Key Facts

  • The Joint Committee on Labor and Workforce Development is directed to make an investigation and study of current Senate documents related to labor and workforce development.
  • The study encompasses Senate, No. 1307 regarding warehouse worker protections filed by Lydia Edwards.
  • The study includes Senate, No. 1311 concerning family support and the right to strike for certain public employees.
  • The study covers Senate, No. 1339 regarding paid family and medical leave for educators.
Show all 8 facts
  • The study incorporates Senate, No. 1343 relating to collective bargaining rights for legislative employees.
  • The review examines Senate, No. 1349 concerning raising the minimum wage closer to a living wage.
  • The review evaluates Senate, No. 1359 regarding municipal unemployment insurance reform.
  • The evaluation includes Senate, No. 1376 relating to unemployment insurance.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Senate Order 3256 do?
It authorizes the on Labor and Workforce Development to investigate and study a set of specific pending Senate bills concerning labor and workforce matters.
Does this order change any existing laws or enact new policies?
No. This is a procedural measure that authorizes a legislative study and does not enact, amend, or repeal any laws.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Aug 17, 2026SenateCommittee
    Discharged to the committee on Senate Rules
  2. Aug 13, 2026SenateCommittee
    Referred to the committee on Rules of the two branches, acting concurrently
  3. Aug 13, 2026Senate
    Accompanied by S1307, S1311, S1339, S1343, S1349, S1359 and S1376
  4. Aug 13, 2026Senate
    Reported from the committee on Labor and Workforce Development (under JR10)

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Connected Entities

Patricia D. Jehlen, Michael D. Brady, Joint Committee on Labor and Workforce Development and 13 more
PersonPatricia D. Jehlen“Sponsor of Senate petitions”Map →
PersonMichael D. Brady“Sponsor of Senate petitions”Map →
OrganizationJoint Committee on Labor and Workforce Development“Committee ordered to conduct an investigation and study”Map →
PersonJason M. Lewis“Sponsor of Senate petitions”Map →
PersonRebecca L. Rausch“Sponsor of Senate petitions”Map →
PersonJohn F. Keenan“Sponsor of Senate petitions”Map →
PersonLydia Edwards“Sponsor of Senate, No. 1307”Map →
PersonVanna Howard“Sponsor of Senate petitions”Map →
PersonMichael J. Barrett“Sponsor of Senate petitions”Map →
PersonJoanne M. Comerford“Sponsor of Senate petitions”Map →
PersonMichael O. Moore“Sponsor of Senate petitions”Map →
PersonJames K. Hawkins“Sponsor of Senate petitions”Map →
PersonBruce E. Tarr“Sponsor of Senate petitions”Map →
PersonJames B. Eldridge“Sponsor of Senate petitions”Map →
PersonManny Cruz“Sponsor of Senate petitions”Map →
PersonDavid F. DeCoste“Sponsor of Senate petitions”Map →

Sources

Open source document

malegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance25
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record