The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.New Jersey bill redefines local exchange telephone companies to preserve municipal business personal property tax base
Last action · January 13, 2026: Introduced, Referred to Assembly Telecommunications and Utilities CommitteeSponsor: Wayne DeAngelo
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
This bill redefines for tax purposes, replacing the annual 51 percent dial-tone access test with a standard based on holding the pre-1996 regional landline monopoly. The measure applies to local exchange telephone companies and New Jersey municipalities, taking effect immediately with retroactive application to January 1, 2007.
Municipalities retain tax assessments on incumbent regional telephone providers without needing to annually verify market-share thresholds, while prevailing municipalities in tax disputes gain mandatory attorney fee awards from the carriers.
- The Tax Court decision in Verizon New Jersey Inc. v. Borough of Hopewell interpreted the 1997 statutory amendments to require telecommunications companies to meet a 51 percent dial-tone access threshold every assessment year. context
- The federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 opened local landline markets to competitive local exchange carriers, ending regional monopolies. context
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
local exchange telephone companies
Carriers are subject to business personal property taxes based on historical regional monopoly status rather than an annual percentage test, and must pay municipal legal fees if they lose tax challenges.
New Jersey municipalities
Municipalities retain business personal property tax bases from incumbent carriers and are eligible for mandatory attorney fee awards in successful tax litigation.
local property taxpayers
Property tax burdens in affected municipalities are insulated from potential erosion caused by telephone companies challenging tax assessments.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does this bill change how telephone companies are taxed?
What happens if a municipality wins a tax dispute against a telephone company?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.
Procedural history
1 action- Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroducedIntroduced, Referred to Assembly Telecommunications and Utilities Committee
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Overturning Judicial Interpretation
The legislation explicitly seeks to legislative-override the Tax Court's interpretation in Verizon New Jersey Inc. v. Borough of Hopewell regarding annual percentage tests.
Connected Entities
Sources
njleg.state.nj.us
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy50Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz25Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools