POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

House Subcommittee Hearing on Expanding U.S. Agricultural Exports

Original title: EXPANDING U.S. AGRICULTURE TRADE AND ELIMINATING BARRIERS TO U.S. EXPORTS

January 1, 2017

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing serves as a formal record of legislative inquiry into trade policies that directly affect the cost of exporting U.S. agricultural goods and the associated employment levels in sectors ranging from farming to biotechnology and transportation.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

U.S. Agricultural Producers

These groups are directly affected by trade policies that determine the tariffs and regulatory barriers they face when exporting goods.

Transportation and Biotech Sectors

These sectors are indirectly affected as they provide services and research that support the agricultural export supply chain.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Trade held a hearing on June 14, 2016, to discuss strategies for increasing U.S. agricultural exports and removing international trade barriers. The hearing focused on the economic impact of agricultural trade on both rural and urban job markets and the challenges posed by high tariffs and non-tariff trade restrictions.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on June 14, 2016, by the Subcommittee on Trade of the Committee on Ways and Means.
  • The primary objective was to address the expansion of U.S. agricultural trade and the elimination of export barriers.
  • Chairman Reichert stated that U.S. fruit and vegetable exporters face average tariffs exceeding 50 percent when selling abroad.
  • The committee noted that two-thirds of jobs supported by agricultural exports are located outside of the farming sector, including transportation, financial services, and biotechnology.
  • The hearing included testimony from representatives of the fruit, brewing, dairy, and pork industries.
  • The record includes 16 written submissions from various industry groups and companies regarding trade issues.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was conducted to examine how to increase U.S. agricultural exports and identify ways to remove international trade barriers, such as tariffs and non-tariff restrictions.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included representatives from the fruit industry, the brewing industry, the National Milk Producers Federation, the Minnesota Farm Bureau, and the National Pork Producers Council.

Why It Matters

This hearing serves as a formal record of legislative inquiry into trade policies that directly affect the cost of exporting U.S. agricultural goods and the associated employment levels in sectors ranging from farming to biotechnology and transportation.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 2 more sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Non-Tariff Barriers

The hearing highlights a strategic shift in focus from traditional tariffs to non-tariff barriers as the primary challenge for agricultural exporters.

Connected Entities

personDale ForemanWitness, Chairman of Foreman Fruit CompanyMap →
personKevin PaapWitness, President of Minnesota Farm BureauMap →
personHeather McClungWitness, Co-Owner of Schooner EXACT Brewing CompanyMap →
personJohn WeberWitness, President of National Pork Producers CouncilMap →
personCharles B. RangelRanking Member of the Subcommittee on TradeMap →
personRandy MooneyWitness, Chairman of National Milk Producers FederationMap →
personDave ReichertChairman of the Subcommittee on TradeMap →
organizationSubcommittee on TradeCommittee on Ways and Means, U.S. House of RepresentativesMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record