The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Save SBA from Sanctuary Cities Act of 2025
Last action · June 9, 2025: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.Sponsors: Brad Finstad and 1 other
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
This bill requires the Small Business Administration (SBA) to move any regional, district, or local offices currently located in 's' to locations that are not. It also prohibits the SBA from opening new offices in these jurisdictions and mandates the suspension of operations for offices that fail to relocate within 60 days of a determination.
If passed, this bill would force the relocation of SBA offices out of jurisdictions that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, potentially disrupting local small business support services and requiring staff reassignments.
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Small Business Administration employees
Employees in affected offices face mandatory reassignment to different duty stations if their office fails to relocate.
Small business owners in sanctuary jurisdictions
These business owners may experience a change in the location or availability of local SBA support services.
State and local governments
Jurisdictions defined as 'sanctuary' under the bill's criteria would lose the presence of local SBA offices.
Key Facts
- The Administrator of the SBA must relocate all regional, district, or local offices currently located in a 'sanctuary jurisdiction'.
- Relocation must occur within 60 days of the Administrator making a public determination that an office is in a sanctuary jurisdiction.
- New offices are prohibited from being established in sanctuary jurisdictions.
- If an office is not relocated within 60 days, it must cease operations until it is moved to a non-sanctuary location.
Show all 10 facts
- Employees of offices that cease operations due to non-compliance must be reassigned to other non-sanctuary offices, preferably within the same state.
- The head of an office that fails to relocate within 60 days must submit a written explanation within 5 days of the deadline.
- The Administrator must remove the head of an office if they fail to provide an explanation or if the explanation is deemed insufficient.
- A 'sanctuary jurisdiction' is defined as any state or local government that restricts sharing immigration status information or complying with federal immigration detainer requests.
- An exception to the sanctuary definition exists for jurisdictions that only limit cooperation regarding individuals who are victims or witnesses to crimes.
- The bill excludes the SBA headquarters from the relocation requirement.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this bill affect the main SBA headquarters?
What happens to employees if their local SBA office is closed for relocation?
Are there any exceptions for sanctuary policies?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.
Procedural history
20 actions- Jun 9, 2025SenateCommitteeReceived in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
- Jun 5, 2025HouseMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Jun 5, 2025HouseFloorOn passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 211 - 199 (Roll no. 153). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H2483)
- Jun 5, 2025HouseFloorPassed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 211 - 199 (Roll no. 153). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H2483)
- Jun 5, 2025HouseOn motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 202 - 210 (Roll no. 152).
- Jun 5, 2025HouseConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2492-2493)
Show 14 earlier actions
- Jun 5, 2025HousePOSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 2931, the Chair put the question on motion to recommit and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Cisneros demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- Jun 5, 2025HouseThe previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.
- Jun 5, 2025HouseMr. Cisneros moved to recommit to the Committee on Small Business. (text: CR H2488)
- Jun 5, 2025HouseThe previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
- Jun 5, 2025HouseDEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 2931.
- Jun 5, 2025HouseRule provides for consideration of H.R. 2483, H.R. 2931, H.R. 2966 and H.R. 2987. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2483 under a structured rule and for consideration of H.R. 2931, H.R. 2966, and H.R. 2987 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate and one motion to recommit on each bill.
- Jun 5, 2025HouseConsidered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 458. (consideration: CR H2483-2489)
- Jun 3, 2025HouseRules Committee Resolution H. Res. 458 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2483, H.R. 2931, H.R. 2966 and H.R. 2987. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2483 under a structured rule and for consideration of H.R. 2931, H.R. 2966, and H.R. 2987 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate and one motion to recommit on each bill.
- May 21, 2025HousePlaced on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 81.
- May 21, 2025HouseReported (Amended) by the Committee on Small Business. H. Rept. 119-110.
- Apr 30, 2025HouseCommitteeOrdered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 15 - 11.
- Apr 30, 2025HouseCommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Apr 17, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to the House Committee on Small Business.
- Apr 17, 2025HouseIntroducedIntroduced in House
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Voting Record
Total
410
- Yes
- 211
- No
- 199
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (410)
386 more members
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Federal Agency Footprint Strategy
This bill represents a strategy to use federal agency location as a tool for enforcing compliance with federal immigration policy at the local level.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.congress.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy85Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment20Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz40Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
