POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Mississippi HB 830 lowers ad valorem tax revenue increase cap from 10% to 2% for political subdivisions and school districts

Original title: Ad valorem taxes; revise certain provisions regarding limitations on increases.

Last action · February 3, 2026: 02/03 (H) Died In CommitteeSponsors: Gene Newman and 2 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

House Bill 830 lowers the maximum allowable annual increase in receipts from 10% to 2% for political subdivisions, counties, municipalities, and school districts, effective January 1, 2027. The measure amends various sections of the Mississippi Code of 1972 to restrict revenue growth limitations and modify school district tax request approvals.

Why it matters

Property owners across Mississippi would experience tighter restrictions on how much local governments and school districts can increase total annual property tax revenues without holding a public referendum or election.

Background
  • Ad valorem taxes in Mississippi are local property taxes assessed by counties, municipalities, and school districts based on the value of property. context
  • House Bill 830 was introduced during the 2026 Regular Session of the Mississippi Legislature and died in committee. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Property Taxpayers

Property owners are subject to stricter statutory caps limiting how much local governments and school districts can increase ad valorem tax revenues annually.

Directly affected

Political Subdivisions and Municipalities

Counties, municipalities, and political subdivisions face a lowered 2% ceiling on annual ad valorem tax receipt increases without holding an election or meeting specific alternative criteria.

Directly affected

School Districts

School boards and levying authorities operate under reduced percentage thresholds (lowered from 4% to 2%) that trigger public notice and referendum requirements for tax effort increases.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does House Bill 830 change regarding property taxes?
HB 830 reduces the statutory cap on annual revenue increases from 10% to 2% for political subdivisions, counties, municipalities, and school districts.
How does the bill affect school district tax requests?
The bill allows school boards to submit requested efforts in dollars, which levying authorities may approve in full or in part, and lowers threshold triggers for public notice and potential referendums from 4% to 2%.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died in committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Feb 3, 2026House
    02/03 (H) Died In Committee
  2. Jan 16, 2026HouseCommittee
    01/16 (H) Referred To Ways and Means

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Systemic Reduction of Tax Growth Caps

The bill uniformly replaces legacy 10% and 4% ad valorem tax increase thresholds with a stricter 2% cap across numerous municipal, county, and educational statutes.

Connected Entities

Kevin Ford, State Tax Commission, Public Employees' Retirement System and 4 more
PersonKevin Ford“Cosponsor representing the 54th district”Map →
OrganizationState Tax Commission“Approves county property reappraisal plans”Map →
OrganizationPublic Employees' Retirement System“Recipient of municipal retirement fund tax levies”Map →
PersonGene Newman“Primary sponsor of House Bill 830”Map →
OrganizationMississippi Supreme Court“Reference to potential adjudication on nuclear plant taxes”Map →
PersonWallace“Cosponsor of House Bill 830”Map →
OrganizationState Department of Education“Calculates local pro rata amounts for aggregate tax receipts”Map →

Sources

Open source document

billstatus.ls.state.ms.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 80)
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record