POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofEnergy →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Massachusetts voids property rules that block solar panels and sets 60-day review limit for homeowners' associations

Original title: An Act ensuring solar energy access

Last action · April 6, 2026: Accompanied a study order, see H5323Sponsors: Carmine Gentile and 6 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Massachusetts voids any property restriction that forbids or unreasonably restricts solar energy systems, and requires homeowners' s to review and decide on solar installations within 60 days. The measure defines unreasonable restrictions as those that increase installation costs by more than 10 per cent or $1,000, decrease efficiency by more than 10 per cent, or substantially burden . Aggrieved property owners may file civil lawsuits to recover damages, costs, and attorneys' fees.

Why it matters

Homeowners living in communities governed by s gain the legal right to install solar energy systems without facing prohibitive financial or efficiency burdens, while associations face strict timelines and potential civil liability for blocking requests.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Homeowners

Homeowners gain the legal right to install solar energy systems free from unreasonable association restrictions and can sue for damages and legal fees if violated.

Directly affected

Homeowners' associations

Associations must review solar installation requests within 60 days, provide written explanations for restrictions, and face potential civil liability for non-compliance.

Key Facts

  • Any property ownership or use instrument that forbids or unreasonably restricts solar energy systems is declared void.
  • Homeowners' associations and similar entities must review homeowner requests regarding solar access and installations and reach a decision within 60 calendar days.
  • Associations must provide written explanations for any restrictions placed on solar access or installations.
  • Unreasonable restrictions include those that increase installation or usage costs by more than 10 per cent or $1,000, whichever is lower.
Show all 8 facts
  • Unreasonable restrictions include those that decrease a solar energy system's efficiency by more than 10 per cent of its specified efficiency.
  • Unreasonable restrictions include those that substantially curtail or burden solar access.
  • Individuals aggrieved by a violation may file a civil action for injunctive relief and damages.
  • Prevailing plaintiffs in civil actions under this section are awarded court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can my homeowners' association ban me from installing solar panels?
No. The bill voids any property instrument or rule that forbids or unreasonably restricts the installation or use of a solar energy system.
How long does an association have to respond to a solar installation request?
An must review the request and reach a decision within a reasonable time that does not exceed 60 calendar days.
What happens if an association imposes unreasonable restrictions on solar panels?
Aggrieved persons can institute a civil action for and damages, and if they prevail, they must be awarded court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

5 actions
  1. Apr 6, 2026House
    Accompanied a study order, see H5323
  2. Dec 4, 2025House
    Reporting date extended to Wednesday, March 18, 2026
  3. Sep 30, 2025Joint
    Hearing scheduled for 10/09/2025 from 01:00 PM-05:00 PM in A-2
  4. Feb 27, 2025Senate
    Senate concurred
  5. Feb 27, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to the committee on Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

General Laws
OrganizationGeneral Laws“Chapter 184 of the General Laws is amended by the bill.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

malegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz45
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record