POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Connecticut creates criminal justice working group to review statutes and recommend changes by January 2027

Original title: AN ACT CONCERNING A STUDY OF THE LAWS OF THIS STATE CONCERNING ISSUES OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE.

Last action · April 13, 2026: File Number 595Sponsor: Travis Simms

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Connecticut establishes a six-member working group with expertise in criminal law and procedure to review of the general statutes and report its findings and recommendations by January 1, 2027.

Why it matters

Establishes an official legislative study panel tasked with reviewing state criminal statutes and delivering policy recommendations to the judiciary committee by January 1, 2027.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

General Assembly legislative leaders

Legislative leaders are each empowered to appoint one member to the criminal justice working group.

Key Facts

  • Establishes a working group to study state criminal justice laws, specifically reviewing titles 18, 53, 53a, and 54 of the general statutes.
  • The working group consists of six members appointed by legislative leaders (speaker of the House, president pro tempore of the Senate, majority and minority leaders of both chambers).
  • Members of the working group must possess expertise in criminal law, criminal procedure, and the criminal justice system.
  • Administrative staff of the joint standing committee having cognizance of matters relating to the judiciary shall staff the working group.
Show all 6 facts
  • The working group must submit a report on its findings and recommendations to the judiciary committee no later than January 1, 2027.
  • The working group terminates upon submitting its report or on January 1, 2027, whichever is later.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of the newly established working group?
To study state laws concerning criminal justice by reviewing of the general statutes and recommending legislative changes.
Who appoints the members of the working group?
Members are appointed by the speaker of the House, the president pro tempore of the Senate, and the majority and minority leaders of both the House and Senate.
When must the working group report its findings?
Not later than January 1, 2027.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · on the Senate floor.

Procedural history

9 actions
  1. Apr 13, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    File Number 595
  2. Apr 13, 2026Senate
    Senate Calendar Number 388
  3. Apr 13, 2026Senate
    Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, Senate
  4. Apr 13, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners' Office
  5. Apr 6, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Referred to Office of Legislative Research and Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/13/26 12:00 PM
  6. Mar 30, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Filed with Legislative Commissioners' Office
Show 3 earlier actions
  1. Mar 30, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Joint Favorable
  2. Mar 13, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Public Hearing 03/18
  3. Mar 12, 2026Connecticut General AssemblyCommittee
    Referred to Joint Committee on Judiciary

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

General Assembly, Judiciary Committee
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Legislative body convening and receiving the report”Map →
OrganizationJudiciary Committee“Committee reporting the bill and receiving the working group's report”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 35)
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record