POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Minnesota prohibits cities, counties, and school districts from using ranked-choice voting

Original title: Political subdivisions prohibited from establishing or enforcing ranked-choice voting.

Last action · February 19, 2025: Author added ScottSponsors: Pam Altendorf and 5 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Local governments and school districts in Minnesota are barred from adopting or enforcing or similar preference-ranking election methods under a new bill introduced in the House. Any existing local rules, resolutions, charter provisions, or ordinances that conflict with this ban are rendered void immediately upon final enactment.

Why it matters

Local jurisdictions currently utilizing or planning to implement for municipal and school board elections must halt those methods and revert to traditional voting systems.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

home rule charter or statutory cities

Cities are barred from adopting or enforcing ranked-choice voting for local elections and must invalidate any existing inconsistent provisions.

Directly affected

counties

Counties cannot establish or enforce ranked-choice voting methods for local office elections.

Directly affected

school districts

School districts are prohibited from using ranked-choice voting for their elections.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which local entities are affected by this voting restriction?
The restriction applies to home rule charter or statutory cities, counties, townships, and school districts in Minnesota.
What happens to existing local rules or ordinances that establish ranked-choice voting?
Any rule, resolution, charter provision, or ordinance inconsistent with the section is declared void.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Feb 19, 2025House
    Author added Scott
  2. Feb 13, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Introduction and first reading, referred to Elections Finance and Government Operations

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Minnesota, Centennial Office Building
locationMinnesota“state where the legislation applies”Map →
OrganizationCentennial Office Building“location of the Office of the Revisor of Statutes”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.revisor.mn.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record