POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

New York bill restricts classroom screen time, bans social media and AI on student devices, and creates tech registry

Original title: Enacts the "Fostering Optimal Classroom Use of Screens (FOCUS) act" to limit use of internet enabled devices and prioritize non-digital teaching methods

Last action · September 2, 2026: REFERRED TO EDUCATIONSponsor: Sarahana Shrestha

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

The FOCUS Act restricts school-issued internet-enabled devices by banning them entirely for pre-K through grade 5, limiting grades 6 through 8 to supervised computer labs or carts, and requiring caregiver opt-in for grades 9 through 12. It prohibits social media, gaming platforms, s, generative AI, and hardware cameras on school devices, while establishing a mandatory Attorney General registry for educational technology providers.

Why it matters

Schools, device providers, and educational technology vendors must overhaul device deployment, software vetting, and contract terms, while students and caregivers gain a right of refusal for digital assignments and testing.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Students in pre-K through grade 12

Their access to school-issued devices, homework requirements, and testing methods are restricted or altered based on grade level.

Directly affected

Caregivers

They receive detailed software disclosures, must provide opt-in consent for older students' devices, and gain the right to refuse device use for their children.

Directly affected

School districts, charter schools, and BOCES

They must adopt written device policies, adjust classroom instruction methods, and ensure they only deploy educational technology from the Attorney General registry.

Directly affected

Educational technology providers and device providers

They must register with the Attorney General, self-attest to statutory and functional requirements, pay registration fees, and limit data processing.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can schools still give tablets or laptops to elementary school students?
No. For pre-kindergarten through grade 5, schools are prohibited from providing school-issued devices to pupils and must generally prohibit access to internet-enabled and electronic devices on school grounds.
Are students required to use social media or AI apps for schoolwork?
No. Schools are prohibited from using social media for official correspondence with pupils, and students cannot be required to create a social media account for class activities. Furthermore, school-issued devices are barred from containing social media, gaming platforms, or s.
Can a parent refuse a school-issued device for their child?
Yes. The bill details a process for pupils or caregivers to refuse to use a school-issued device for assignments, tests, or assessments if a reasonable non-digital alternative exists, including for standardized tests.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Sep 2, 2026HouseCommittee
    REFERRED TO EDUCATION

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Comprehensive Ed-Tech and Screen Regulation

The bill shifts New York education law from permissive digital integration toward mandatory analog prioritization and strict prohibitions on emerging technologies like generative AI in classrooms.

Connected Entities

COMMITTEE ON RULES, Sarahana Shrestha, Committee on Education and 3 more
OrganizationCOMMITTEE ON RULES“Introduced the bill in the Assembly.”Map →
PersonSarahana Shrestha“Member of Assembly representing District 103, requested the introduction of the ”Map →
OrganizationCommittee on Education“Assembly committee to which the bill was referred.”Map →
OrganizationCommissioner“Works with the Attorney General to review registration requirements and recommen”Map →
OrganizationAttorney General“Responsible for maintaining the educational technology provider registry, receiv”Map →
OrganizationBoard of Regents“Approves computer science and digital fluency learning standards.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.nysenate.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz65
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record