POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Alabama updates habitual offender law to treat nolo contendere and Alford pleas as guilty convictions

Original title: Habitual offender law; pleas of nolo contendere treated as a plea of guilty

Last action · April 15, 2026: EnactedSponsor: Brock Colvin

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Alabama requires courts to treat a plea of , no contest, a best interests plea, or an the same as a guilty conviction under the , starting October 1, 2026. The act also clarifies that "convicted" includes prior convictions from Alabama or any other state.

Why it matters

Criminal defendants facing enhanced sentencing under Alabama's will have prior out-of-state convictions and alternative pleas counted identically to standard guilty verdicts.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Criminal defendants

Defendants with out-of-state convictions or alternative pleas face mandatory inclusion of those records under habitual offender sentencing enhancements.

Directly affected

Trial courts

Judges must evaluate and treat nolo contendere, no contest, best interests, and Alford pleas identically to guilty pleas when applying habitual offender penalties.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

How are no contest pleas handled under the updated habitual offender law?
A plea of or no contest is treated in the same manner as a conviction based on a plea of guilty, unless the plea has been expunged.
When does this new requirement take effect?
The act becomes effective on October 1, 2026.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Became law.

Procedural history

21 actions
  1. Apr 15, 2026HouseEnrolled
    Enacted
  2. Apr 9, 2026HouseEnrolled
    Delivered to Governor
  3. Apr 9, 2026Senate
    Signature Requested
  4. Apr 9, 2026House
    Enrolled
  5. Apr 9, 2026House
    Ready to Enroll
  6. Apr 9, 2026SenateFloor
    Motion to Read a Third Time and Pass - Adopted Roll Call 1322
Show 15 earlier actions
  1. Feb 25, 2026Senate
    Read for the Second Time and placed on the Calendar
  2. Feb 25, 2026SenateCommittee
    Reported Out of Committee Second House
  3. Feb 10, 2026SenateCommittee
    Pending Committee Action in Second House
  4. Feb 10, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Read for the first time and referred to the Senate Committee on Judiciary
  5. Feb 10, 2026House
    Engrossed
  6. Feb 10, 2026HouseFloor
    Motion to Read a Third Time and Pass as Amended - Adopted Roll Call 358
  7. Feb 10, 2026House
    Motion to Adopt - Adopted Roll Call 357
  8. Feb 10, 2026House
    Robbins 1st Amendment Offered
  9. Feb 10, 2026House
    Motion to Adopt - Adopted Roll Call 356
  10. Feb 10, 2026House
    Judiciary Engrossed Substitute Offered
  11. Feb 10, 2026House
    Third Reading in House of Origin
  12. Feb 5, 2026House
    Read for the Second Time and placed on the Calendar
  13. Feb 4, 2026HouseCommittee
    Reported Out of Committee House of Origin
  14. Jan 14, 2026HouseCommittee
    Pending Committee Action in House of Origin
  15. Jan 14, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read for the first time and referred to the House Committee on Judiciary

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Faulkner, Simpson, Brock Colvin and 1 more
PersonFaulkner“Representative co-sponsoring HB 226”Map →
PersonSimpson“Representative co-sponsoring HB 226”Map →
PersonBrock Colvin“Representative introducing HB 226”Map →
PersonJohn Treadwell“Clerk of the House of Representatives”Map →

Sources

Open source document

alison.legislature.state.al.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record