POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Review of the 2021 Federal Research and Development Budget Proposal

Original title: A REVIEW OF THE ADMINISTRATION'S FEDERAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BUDGET PROPOSAL FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021

Record date · January 1, 2021

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

The House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology held a hearing to review the Administration's proposed research and development () budget for Fiscal Year 2021. Committee leadership expressed significant concerns regarding proposed funding cuts to key scientific agencies and programs, despite the Administration's claims of increased investment.

Why it matters

The budget proposal outlines federal funding priorities for scientific research, space exploration, and environmental programs, which directly impacts the scope of national scientific projects and the availability of education resources for the 2021 fiscal year.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Scientific Research Community

Researchers and institutions relying on federal grants face potential funding changes across multiple agencies including NSF, DOE, and NOAA.

Directly affected

STEM Students

Proposed changes to STEM education funding may alter the availability of resources and programs for students.

Key Facts

  • The Administration's FY 2021 budget proposal represents a 9 percent cut to total R&D funding, according to the Committee Chairwoman.
  • The National Science Foundation (NSF) faces a 6.5 percent overall budget cut, with increases for AI and quantum science offset by cuts to other research areas and STEM education.
  • The Department of Energy (DOE) faces a proposed $4.5 billion cut to non-defense R&D programs.
  • The budget proposal includes the elimination of the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) program.
Show all 8 facts
  • NASA's budget request includes an increase for human space exploration, funded in part by reductions in other science missions and STEM education.
  • The proposal includes cuts to atmospheric and ocean research at NOAA.
  • The proposal includes cuts to EPA assessment programs.
  • The hearing took place on February 27, 2020, in the Rayburn House Office Building.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the proposed budget increase funding for science and technology?
The Administration claims a 6 percent increase, but the Committee Chairwoman asserts that when compared to actual appropriations from the previous year, the proposal represents a 9 percent cut.
What happens to the ARPA-E program in this budget?
The Administration's proposal includes the elimination of the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy ().

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Budget Math Discrepancy

The Committee and the Administration utilize different baselines for calculating R&D budget increases, leading to a 15-percentage-point gap in how the budget's growth is characterized.

Connected Entities

Eddie Bernice Johnson, NOAA, Kelvin K. Droegemeier and 6 more
PersonEddie Bernice Johnson“Chairwoman of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology”Map →
OrganizationNOAA“National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration”Map →
PersonKelvin K. Droegemeier“Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP)”Map →
OrganizationNASA“National Aeronautics and Space Administration”Map →
OrganizationEPA“Environmental Protection Agency”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Energy“Federal department overseeing energy research”Map →
OrganizationARPA-E“Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy”Map →
PersonFrank Lucas“Ranking Member of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology”Map →
OrganizationNational Science Foundation“Federal agency for fundamental research”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record