POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Massachusetts Bill S.780 Requires Mental Health Parity in Disability Insurance Policies

Original title: An Act requiring mental health parity for disability policies

Last action · November 17, 2025: Committee recommended ought to pass and referred to the committee on Senate Ways and MeansSponsors: Joan Lovely and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Massachusetts bill S.780 prohibits short-term and long-term disability insurance policies from imposing benefit limitations or exclusions for that are not applied equally to physical disorders.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Disability insurance claimants

Claimants with behavioral health conditions receive equal coverage terms compared to those with physical health conditions.

Directly affected

Disability insurance providers

Insurers must adjust their individual and group policy terms, exclusions, and medical examination protocols to ensure behavioral health parity.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill apply to both individual and group disability policies?
Yes, the bill applies both to individual policies of short-term or long-term disability insurance and to certificates of coverage under group policies.
Can insurance companies still require medical exams to prove a disability exists?
Yes, insurers may still require periodic medical exams or procedures to determine if a disability exists or continues, provided those protocols are comparable and no more frequent or onerous than those used for physical disorders.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

5 actions
  1. Nov 17, 2025SenateCommittee
    Committee recommended ought to pass and referred to the committee on Senate Ways and Means
  2. Aug 28, 2025SenateCommittee
    Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on Health Care Financing
  3. May 7, 2025Joint
    Hearing scheduled for 05/13/2025 from 10:00 AM-01:00 PM in A-2
  4. Feb 27, 2025House
    House concurred
  5. Feb 27, 2025SenateCommittee
    Referred to the committee on Financial Services

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Extension of Parity to Disability Policies

The legislation amends chapter 175 of the General Laws to bridge the coverage gap between physical and behavioral health restrictions in disability insurance.

Connected Entities

General Laws, Joan Lovely, Mike Barrett
OrganizationGeneral Laws“Statutes being amended by the bill”Map →
PersonJoan Lovely“Primary sponsor of Senate Bill No. 780”Map →
PersonMike Barrett“Cosponsor of Senate Bill No. 780”Map →

Sources

Open source document

malegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy25
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record