POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Utah Legislature restructures the Executive Appropriations Committee membership for joint subcommittees

Original title: Joint Rules Resolution - Appropriations Subcommittee Amendments

Last action · March 6, 2026: House/ filedSponsor: Matt MacPherson

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

This changes the composition of the Executive Appropriations Committee to consist of 20 members drawn from joint co-chairs and minority party appointees, effective May 6, 2026.

Why it matters

Changes how legislative budget decisions are organized by shifting committee seats away from party leadership toward chairs and minority party appointees.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Legislators

Lawmakers participating in leadership or appropriations subcommittees face changes to committee eligibility and seating.

Directly affected

Office of the Legislative Fiscal Analyst

The office continues to provide staff support for the revised Executive Appropriations Committee.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who serves on the restructured Executive Appropriations Committee?
The committee consists of the Senate and House co-chairs of eight joint s, plus two members each appointed by the Senate and House minority party leaders.
Which agency provides staff support for the committee?
The Office of the Legislative Fiscal Analyst staffs the Executive Appropriations Committee.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This resolution did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.

Procedural history

21 actions
  1. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ filed
  2. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ strike enacting clause
  3. Feb 16, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HJR024S02
  4. Feb 16, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HJR024S02
  5. Feb 16, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HJR024S02
  6. Feb 16, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HJR024S02
Show 15 earlier actions
  1. Feb 12, 2026House
    House Comm - Motion to Recommend Failed
  2. Feb 12, 2026House
    House Comm - Substitute Recommendation
  3. Feb 12, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HJR024S01
  4. Feb 12, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HJR024S01
  5. Feb 12, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HJR024S01
  6. Feb 12, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HJR024S01
  7. Feb 10, 2026House
    House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  8. Feb 9, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HJR024
  9. Feb 9, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HJR024
  10. Feb 9, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  11. Feb 9, 2026House
    House/ received bill from Legislative Research
  12. Feb 9, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HJR024
  13. Feb 9, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HJR024
  14. Feb 9, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  15. Feb 9, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Public Education Appropriations Subcommittee, Executive Appropriations Committee, Criminal Justice Appropriations Subcommittee and 8 more
OrganizationPublic Education Appropriations Subcommittee“Joint appropriations subcommittee whose co-chairs serve on the Executive Appropr”Map →
OrganizationExecutive Appropriations Committee“Committee whose membership is modified by the resolution”Map →
OrganizationCriminal Justice Appropriations Subcommittee“Joint appropriations subcommittee whose co-chairs serve on the Executive Appropr”Map →
OrganizationHigher Education Appropriations Subcommittee“Joint appropriations subcommittee whose co-chairs serve on the Executive Appropr”Map →
OrganizationNatural Resources, Agriculture, and Environmental Quality Appropriations Subcommittee“Joint appropriations subcommittee whose co-chairs serve on the Executive Appropr”Map →
OrganizationSocial Services Appropriations Subcommittee“Joint appropriations subcommittee whose co-chairs serve on the Executive Appropr”Map →
PersonMatt MacPherson“Chief Sponsor in the House”Map →
OrganizationOffice of the Legislative Fiscal Analyst“Staffs the Executive Appropriations Committee”Map →
OrganizationEconomic and Community Development Appropriations Subcommittee“Joint appropriations subcommittee whose co-chairs serve on the Executive Appropr”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Government Appropriations Subcommittee“Joint appropriations subcommittee whose co-chairs serve on the Executive Appropr”Map →
OrganizationTransportation and Infrastructure Appropriations Subcommittee“Joint appropriations subcommittee whose co-chairs serve on the Executive Appropr”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 35)
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record