Congressional Hearing on EPA Management and Misconduct
January 1, 2015
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This hearing examines whether EPA leadership failed to address serial sexual harassment allegations against employees, potentially impacting federal workplace safety standards and agency accountability.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
EPA Employees
Employees are subject to the agency's internal management, harassment, and disciplinary policies.
EPA Leadership
Leadership is responsible for responding to congressional oversight regarding agency management and misconduct protocols.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2015.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing was the second session held by the committee in 2015 regarding EPA management failures.
- The committee reviewed allegations that former EPA manager Peter Jutro harassed at least 16 women.
- 13 formal complaints of misconduct were filed against Peter Jutro.
- The EPA Office of Inspector General (OIG) began an investigation into Peter Jutro in August 2014.
- The OIG investigation corroborated sexual harassment of a 21-year-old female intern by Peter Jutro.
- The committee heard testimony from five EPA-related witnesses, including the EPA Administrator.
- The hearing record includes statements from the National Treasury Employees Union and various EPA employees.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the primary purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
Why It Matters
This hearing examines whether EPA leadership failed to address serial sexual harassment allegations against employees, potentially impacting federal workplace safety standards and agency accountability.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Pattern of Oversight
The committee held multiple hearings on the same topic within a few months, indicating a sustained effort to pressure the agency on internal conduct.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance80How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy75Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment40Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz30Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools