POLISCOPE
Back to feed
CALACCESS COUNTYlobbying

Lobbying Payment Disclosure: California Limousine Association

Original title: NOSSAMAN GUTHNER KNOX & ELLIOTT LLP lobbying for CALIFORNIA LIMOUSINE ASSOCIATION

June 20, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The payment represents a settlement for services rendered prior to the termination of the lobbying relationship in 1995, rather than active lobbying work during the reporting period.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

California Limousine Association

The association fulfilled a financial obligation for past legal services.

Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP

The firm received payment for services rendered prior to 1995.

What changed

Last recorded activity June 20, 2026.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document discloses a $325 payment received by the law firm Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP from the California Limousine Association for the period of January 1, 2000, to March 31, 2000.

Key Facts

  • The reporting period for this disclosure is January 1, 2000, through March 31, 2000.
  • The total payment received by Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP from the California Limousine Association was $325.
  • The payment was for a past-due invoice related to services provided before September 30, 1995.
  • The firm was no longer serving as a Lobbyist Employer for the California Limousine Association during the reporting period.
  • There was no active lobbying activity conducted during the period of January 1, 2000, to March 31, 2000.

Why It Matters

The payment represents a settlement for services rendered prior to the termination of the lobbying relationship in 1995, rather than active lobbying work during the reporting period.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did the California Limousine Association hire a lobbyist during this period?
No. The payment was for services provided prior to the termination of the lobbying relationship in 1995.
Why was this payment reported if no lobbying occurred?
Lobbying disclosure laws require the reporting of all payments received from clients, including payments for past-due invoices.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

financial connection100% confidence

Delayed Payment Settlement

The payment was made nearly five years after the termination of the professional relationship.

Connected Entities

organizationCalifornia Limousine AssociationThe organization that made the payment.Map →
organizationNossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLPLaw firm acting as the lobbying entity.Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.sos.ca.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance10
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy0
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment0
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz0
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record