POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Utah creates signature cure process for initiative and referendum petitions

Original title: Initiative and Referenda Signature Amendments

Last action · March 6, 2026: House/ filedSponsor: Andrew Stoddard

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

This bill creates a process to cure an initiative or referendum petition signature that is declared invalid.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Utah voters

Voters who sign initiative or referendum petitions receive the right to cure mismatched signatures and have their votes counted upon submitting a timely affidavit.

Directly affected

county clerks

County clerks must notify voters of invalid signatures, distribute affidavit forms, process returned affidavits, and update the statewide voter registration database.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if my petition signature does not match the voter registration database?
The county clerk must notify you within two business days and provide an affidavit that you can complete and return to cure the invalid signature.
What is the deadline to return the signature curing affidavit?
You must deliver the signed and completed affidavit to the county clerk no later than 31 calendar days after the day the county clerk receives the initiative or referendum packet containing your signature.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

15 actions
  1. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ filed
  2. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ strike enacting clause
  3. Mar 5, 2026House
    House/ comm rpt/ sent to Rules
  4. Mar 2, 2026House
    House Comm - Recommends Returned to Rules
  5. Feb 27, 2026House
    House Comm - Held
  6. Feb 25, 2026HouseCommittee
    House/ to standing committee
Show 9 earlier actions
  1. Feb 24, 2026House
    House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  2. Feb 24, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0583
  3. Feb 23, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0583
  4. Feb 18, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  5. Feb 18, 2026House
    House/ received bill from Legislative Research
  6. Feb 18, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0583
  7. Feb 18, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0583
  8. Feb 18, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  9. Feb 18, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Establishment of Petition Signature Cure

The legislation introduces a structured remedy for petition signatures rejected due to database mismatches, aligning petition signature rules closer to mail-in ballot curing standards.

Connected Entities

LONG, Andrew Stoddard
PersonLONG“Senate Sponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonAndrew Stoddard“Chief Sponsor of the bill”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 50)
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record