The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Missouri bill empowers St. Louis City sheriff to set attorney salary and remove statutory pay caps
Last action · May 12, 2026: Hearing Conducted H Emerging IssuesSponsor: Karla May
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
The Missouri Senate passed SB 944 to eliminate the statutory pay range of $3,000 to $15,000 per year for the attorney of the sheriff of the City of St. Louis, granting the sheriff direct authority to set the attorney's compensation and terms of employment.
Removes state-mandated salary limits for a local legal position, shifting compensation authority entirely to the local sheriff.
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
the sheriff of the City of St. Louis
Gains the authority to set compensation and employment terms for their attorney.
the attorney for the sheriff of the City of St. Louis
Subject to salary determination directly by the sheriff and serves at the pleasure of the sheriff rather than under fixed statutory pay bands.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who determines the salary of the St. Louis City sheriff's attorney under this bill?
What were the previous salary limits for the attorney?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Check Your Understanding
1.According to version 4889S.03P of the bill, what are the employment terms for the attorney employed by a sheriff pursuant to subsection 1?
Auto-generated · not yet reviewed
2.According to version 4889S.03P of the bill, who is authorized to set the compensation for the attorney hired under this section?
Auto-generated · not yet reviewed
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.
Procedural history
13 actions- May 12, 2026HouseHearing Conducted H Emerging Issues
- Apr 21, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred H Emerging Issues
- Mar 25, 2026HouseFloorH Second Read
- Mar 24, 2026SenateFloorSCS S adopted
- Mar 24, 2026SenateFloorS Third Read and Passed - Consent
- Mar 24, 2026HouseIntroducedH First Read
Show 7 earlier actions
- Mar 9, 2026SenateReported from S Transportation, Infrastructure and Public Safety Committee - Consent w/SCS
- Feb 9, 2026SenateCommitteeSCS Voted Do Pass S Transportation, Infrastructure and Public Safety Committee (4889S.03C)
- Feb 9, 2026SenateMotion to pass bill as consent taken by S Transportation, Infrastructure and Public Safety Committee - Consent vote adopted
- Jan 20, 2026SenateHearing Conducted S Transportation, Infrastructure and Public Safety Committee
- Jan 8, 2026SenateFloorSecond Read and Referred S Transportation, Infrastructure and Public Safety Committee
- Jan 7, 2026SenateIntroducedS First Read
- Dec 1, 2025SenatePrefiled
Version history & redline
3 versions on fileLobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
www.senate.mo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
