POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Missouri bill empowers St. Louis City sheriff to set attorney salary and remove statutory pay caps

Original title: Modifies the salary for the attorney of the sheriff of St. Louis City

Last action · May 12, 2026: Hearing Conducted H Emerging IssuesSponsor: Karla May

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

The Missouri Senate passed SB 944 to eliminate the statutory pay range of $3,000 to $15,000 per year for the attorney of the sheriff of the City of St. Louis, granting the sheriff direct authority to set the attorney's compensation and terms of employment.

Why it matters

Removes state-mandated salary limits for a local legal position, shifting compensation authority entirely to the local sheriff.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

the sheriff of the City of St. Louis

Gains the authority to set compensation and employment terms for their attorney.

Directly affected

the attorney for the sheriff of the City of St. Louis

Subject to salary determination directly by the sheriff and serves at the pleasure of the sheriff rather than under fixed statutory pay bands.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who determines the salary of the St. Louis City sheriff's attorney under this bill?
The sheriff of the City of St. Louis sets the rate of compensation.
What were the previous salary limits for the attorney?
State law previously required compensation to be between $3,000 and $15,000 per year.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Check Your Understanding

1.According to version 4889S.03P of the bill, what are the employment terms for the attorney employed by a sheriff pursuant to subsection 1?

Auto-generated · not yet reviewed

2.According to version 4889S.03P of the bill, who is authorized to set the compensation for the attorney hired under this section?

Auto-generated · not yet reviewed

Where This Stands

Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

13 actions
  1. May 12, 2026House
    Hearing Conducted H Emerging Issues
  2. Apr 21, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred H Emerging Issues
  3. Mar 25, 2026HouseFloor
    H Second Read
  4. Mar 24, 2026SenateFloor
    SCS S adopted
  5. Mar 24, 2026SenateFloor
    S Third Read and Passed - Consent
  6. Mar 24, 2026HouseIntroduced
    H First Read
Show 7 earlier actions
  1. Mar 9, 2026Senate
    Reported from S Transportation, Infrastructure and Public Safety Committee - Consent w/SCS
  2. Feb 9, 2026SenateCommittee
    SCS Voted Do Pass S Transportation, Infrastructure and Public Safety Committee (4889S.03C)
  3. Feb 9, 2026Senate
    Motion to pass bill as consent taken by S Transportation, Infrastructure and Public Safety Committee - Consent vote adopted
  4. Jan 20, 2026Senate
    Hearing Conducted S Transportation, Infrastructure and Public Safety Committee
  5. Jan 8, 2026SenateFloor
    Second Read and Referred S Transportation, Infrastructure and Public Safety Committee
  6. Jan 7, 2026SenateIntroduced
    S First Read
  7. Dec 1, 2025Senate
    Prefiled

Version history & redline

3 versions on file
Comparing 4889S.03C - Senate Committee Substitute → 4889S.03P - Perfected
removed addedOfficial text
EXPLANATION-Matter enclosed in bold-faced brackets [thus] in this bill is not enacted and is intended to be omitted in the law. SECOND REGULAR SESSION added: [PERFECTED] SENATE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO. 944 103RD GENERAL ASSEMBLY removed: 4889S.03C added: 4889S.03P KRISTINA MARTIN, Secretary AN ACT To repeal section 57.540, RSMo, and to enact in lieu thereof one new section relating to compensation for the […] more than fifteen thousand dollars per annum, payable in semimonthly installments]. The sheriff shall set the compensation for an attorney hired pursuant to this removed: section, added: section and such compensation shall be paid out of the same funds and revenue as the sheriff of such city is paid. 2. The attorney employed by a sheriff pursuant to subsection 1 of this section shall be employed at the pleasure of the sheriff.
Redline computed from the official version text (record lane).View this version →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

General Assembly, City of St. Louis
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Body enacting the legislation”Map →
locationCity of St. Louis“Jurisdiction where the sheriff and attorney operate”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.senate.mo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record