POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofIran
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Congressional Hearing on U.S. Withdrawal from the Iran Nuclear Deal

Original title: PROTECTING AMERICA FROM A BAD DEAL: ENDING U.S. PARTICIPATION IN THE NUCLEAR AGREEMENT WITH IRAN

January 1, 2018

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing formalizes the legislative record regarding the U.S. government's policy shift to terminate the Iran nuclear deal and reimpose economic , which impacts international diplomatic relations and global economic policy.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Iranian Regime

The regime is subject to the reimposition of U.S. economic sanctions.

U.S. Government

The government is shifting its foreign policy and enforcement of international agreements.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2018.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a June 6, 2018, House Subcommittee on National Security hearing regarding the U.S. decision to withdraw from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (). The hearing features testimony from various policy experts regarding the implications of ending U.S. participation in the agreement and reimposing on Iran.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on June 6, 2018, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
  • President Trump announced the termination of U.S. participation in the JCPOA on May 8, 2018.
  • The U.S. government began the process of reimposing sanctions on Iran following the withdrawal.
  • The hearing record includes testimony from five expert witnesses representing various research institutions.
  • The subcommittee chairman stated that the deal provided Iran with billions in sanctions relief, including $1.7 billion in cash.

Why It Matters

The hearing formalizes the legislative record regarding the U.S. government's policy shift to terminate the Iran nuclear deal and reimpose economic , which impacts international diplomatic relations and global economic policy.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to review the decision to withdraw the United States from the Iran nuclear deal and discuss the subsequent reimposition of .
Who testified at the hearing?
The witnesses included Richard Goldberg, David Albright, Michael Pregent, Jim Walsh, and Michael Rubin.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 2 more sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Formalization of JCPOA Withdrawal

The hearing serves as the official legislative record for the executive branch's decision to exit the Iran nuclear agreement.

Connected Entities

personMichael PregentWitness, Senior Fellow at Hudson InstituteMap →
personDavid AlbrightWitness, President of the Institute for Science and International SecurityMap →
personJim WalshWitness, Senior Research Associate at MITMap →
personMichael RubinWitness, Resident Scholar at American Enterprise InstituteMap →
personRon DeSantisChairman of the Subcommittee on National SecurityMap →
personRichard GoldbergWitness, Senior Advisor at Foundation for Defense of DemocraciesMap →
otherJoint Comprehensive Plan of ActionThe nuclear agreement with IranMap →
personDonald TrumpPresident of the United States who initiated the withdrawalMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy80
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record