POLISCOPE
Back to feed
SB 1128FLORIDA · STATEWIDESession 2026dead
High Impact

Proposed Changes to Family Court Procedures and Child Custody Hearings

Original title: Family Law

March 13, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

Parents involved in custody disputes will face new, mandatory timelines for court hearings, potentially accelerating the resolution of temporary custody and enforcement motions, while the state will begin tracking and reporting on judicial efficiency in these cases.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Parents in custody disputes

They are subject to new mandatory timelines for hearings and changes to how parenting plans are determined by the court.

Family law judges

They must adhere to new statutory deadlines for conducting hearings and issuing orders on time-sharing matters.

Office of the State Courts Administrator

They are required to collect data and publish an annual report on court hearing performance.

What changed

Last recorded activity March 13, 2026.

What's next

Introduced.

Summary

This bill establishes strict deadlines for court hearings regarding temporary child custody and enforcement of existing orders. It also mandates that the Office of the State Courts Administrator publish annual reports on these court timelines and removes automatic legal presumptions that previously granted sole custody to one parent in certain paternity cases.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

How quickly must a judge hear a motion to enforce a time-sharing order?
Under the bill, the court must conduct a hearing within 5 business days after the motion is served.
Can a court force me to go to mediation before a hearing?
No, the bill prohibits the court from requiring mediation as a condition for setting or conducting a hearing unless both parties consent.
What happens to the presumption that a mother gets sole custody if no plan is in place?
The bill deletes the provisions that previously presumed the mother or would receive sole custody and in the absence of a court-ordered plan.

Why It Matters

Parents involved in custody disputes will face new, mandatory timelines for court hearings, potentially accelerating the resolution of temporary custody and enforcement motions, while the state will begin tracking and reporting on judicial efficiency in these cases.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Lobbying Activity

AARP

$4,110,000

2026

HEALTH ISSUESMEDICARE/MEDICAIDLAW ENFORCEMENT/CRIME/CRIMINAL JUSTICEPHARMACY

P.L. 119-21, One Big Beautiful Bill Act H.R. 8867, Planning for Long-term Aging Needs (PLAN) Act H.R. 5861, Legacy Act of 2025 H.R. 9393, the Lower Costs, More Transparency Act. H.R. 9396, the Prior Authorization Accountability Act. S. 4916, the Aging with Artificial Intelligence Act. H.R. 8100, Safe Staffing Saves Lives Act. S. 3886, Nurses Belong in Nursing Homes Act. H.R. 6766/S. 3492, the Essential Caregivers Act of 2025. H.R. 7966/S. 4118, Hospice Care Accountability, Reform, and Enforcement (Hospice CARE) Act. S. 2120, the Older Americans Act Reauthorization Act of 2025 H.R. 5575, the Firefighters Assisting Seniors to Emergency Response (FASTER) Act of 2025. H.R. 3954/S. 4641, Improving Access to Medicare Coverage Act. H.R.5554/S.2831, Stand Strong for Medicare Act. S. 3439/H.R. 6735, Connecting Caregivers to Medicare Act and efforts related to the bill S. 1227/H.R. 2491, Alleviating Barriers for Caregivers Act S. 668/H.R. 3183, Supporting Access to Falls Education and Prevention and Strengthening Training Efforts and Promoting Safety Initiatives (SAFE STEPS) for Veterans Act of 2025 CMS-1851-P, Hospice Proposed rule. CMS-1843-P, Skilled Nursing Facility Proposed rule. CMS-1844-P, Home Health Proposed rule. No bill number. Health care transparency. No bill number. Discussed use of artificial intelligence and health data technology. No bill number. Discussed health-related policies and activities around the fall respiratory virus season. No bill number. Discussed health insurance affordability proposals. No bill number. Discussed Nursing Home staffing standards, safety, and quality. No bill number. Discussed Nursing home transparency and ownership requirements. No bill number. Discussed home health, hospice, and long-term care. No bill number. Discussed falls prevention. No bill number. Discussed social isolation. No bill number. Discussed HUD Assisted Living Requirements No bill number. Discussed family caregiving. No bill number. Discussed AARP paper on Medicare Caregiver Training Services. No bill number. Discussed Medicaid community engagement interim final rule, including the family caregiver exemption. No bill number. Discussed the paid direct care workforce in long-term care. No bill number. Discussed the unaffordability of long-term care. No bill number. Discussed Money Follows the Person Rebalancing Demonstration Program and Medicaid HCBS spousal impoverishment protections. No bill number. Discussed Medicaid fraud and family caregivers, Medicaid self-direction programs. No bill number. Discussed sandwich generation family caregiver hearing and submitted a statement for the record discussing family caregivers and sandwich generation caregivers, programs that support them, AARP caregiving resources, and federal policies to support sandwich generation caregivers and caregivers more broadly. No bill number. Discussed long-term care. No bill number. CMS-2453-NC; Medicaid Program; 2028 Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services Quality Measure Set Submitted comments No bill number. Discussed expanding access to home care. No bill number. Discussed the increasing cost of home care No bill number. Discussed HSA use for telehealth chronic care management services/subscriptions. No bill number. Discussed artificial intelligence and technology

NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH

on behalf of UNIFORM LAW COMMISSION (NAT'L CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS ON UNIFORM STATE LAWS)

CURE SMA

$75,000

MILLER STRATEGIES, LLC

on behalf of NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDATION

SINGISER SOLUTIONS LLC

on behalf of HOPEWELL FUND

MARY K MINAGHAN DBA MKM SERVICES

on behalf of CHICAGOLAND APARTMENT ASSOCIATION

Senate LDAView filing →

MARY K MINAGHAN DBA MKM SERVICES

on behalf of CHICAGOLAND APARTMENT ASSOCIATION

Senate LDAView filing →

LANGDON D NEAL

on behalf of STEANS FAMILY FOUNDATION

Senate LDAView filing →

MARY K MINAGHAN DBA MKM SERVICES

on behalf of CHICAGOLAND APARTMENT ASSOCIATION

Senate LDAView filing →

Voting Record

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Shift from Discretionary to Mandatory Timelines

The bill moves family court from a system of judicial discretion regarding hearing scheduling to a rigid, statutory deadline-based system for time-sharing disputes.

Connected Entities

Sources

Open source document

openstates.org

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record