The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Mississippi proposes $1.5 million appropriation for Town of Walls town hall construction
Last action · February 25, 2026: 02/25 (S) Died In CommitteeSponsor: Gillespie Isom
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Mississippi Senate Bill 3317 appropriates $1.5 million from the State General Fund to the Town of Walls for the construction and design of a new town hall for 2027, taking effect July 1, 2026.
Provides state funding specifically dedicated to municipal infrastructure in the Town of Walls, drawing $1,500,000 from unappropriated state funds.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Town of Walls
Receives $1,500,000 in state funding for the construction and design of a new town hall.
State Treasurer
Must pay out the appropriated money from the State General Fund upon warrants issued by the State Fiscal Officer.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much money does Senate Bill 3317 appropriate?
What is the appropriated money to be used for?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died in committee.
Procedural history
2 actions- Feb 25, 2026Senate02/25 (S) Died In Committee
- Feb 24, 2026SenateCommittee02/24 (S) Referred To Appropriations
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
billstatus.ls.state.ms.us
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 25)
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
