POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Oklahoma Department of Transportation required to establish invasive woody species removal program

Original title: Transportation; defining term; requiring Oklahoma Department of Transportation establish and implement certain program; effective date.

Last action · May 30, 2025: Died in conferenceSponsors: Carl Newton and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

The Oklahoma Department of Transportation is required to establish and implement a program for identifying, removing, and managing along its starting November 1, 2025.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Oklahoma Department of Transportation

ODOT must establish and implement the identification, removal, and management program for invasive woody species within its rights-of-way.

Directly affected

Adjoining landowners

Key Facts

  • The Oklahoma Department of Transportation must establish a program to identify, remove, and manage invasive woody species on its rights-of-way.
  • Invasive woody species are defined as trees or shrubs rapidly encroaching into adjoining lands that cause harm to the environment or economy, explicitly including Eastern Redcedar, Rocky Mountain juniper, oneseed juniper, and salt cedar.
  • The eradication program must include surveys, a prioritized eradication plan, best management practices that minimize harm to native vegetation and soil erosion, monitoring, and agency collaboration.
  • The act becomes effective on November 1, 2025.

Frequently Asked Questions

What plants are targeted by the new transportation program?
The program targets that rapidly encroach on adjoining lands and harm the environment or economy, including Eastern Redcedar, Rocky Mountain juniper, oneseed juniper, and salt cedar.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died on the House floor.

Procedural history

34 actions
  1. May 30, 2025House
    Died in conference
  2. May 15, 2025Senate
    Conference granted, GCCA
  3. May 15, 2025House
    HC's named: GCCA
  4. May 14, 2025House
    SA's rejected, conference requested, conferees to be named later
  5. May 8, 2025House
    SA's received
  6. May 8, 2025Senate
    Engrossed to House
Show 28 earlier actions
  1. May 7, 2025SenateCommittee
    Referred for engrossment
  2. May 7, 2025SenateFloor
    Measure passed: Ayes: 46 Nays: 0
  3. May 7, 2025Senate
    General Order, Considered
  4. Apr 28, 2025Senate
    Placed on General Order
  5. Apr 23, 2025SenateFloor
    Reported Do Pass Appropriations committee; CR filed
  6. Apr 7, 2025SenateCommittee
    Referred to Appropriations
  7. Apr 7, 2025Senate
    Enacting clause stricken
  8. Apr 7, 2025SenateFloor
    Reported Do Pass as amended Aeronautics and Transportation committee; CR filed
  9. Apr 1, 2025SenateCommittee
    Second Reading referred to Aeronautics and Transportation Committee then to Appropriations Committee
  10. Mar 18, 2025SenateIntroduced
    First Reading
  11. Mar 18, 2025House
    Engrossed, signed, to Senate
  12. Mar 17, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred for engrossment
  13. Mar 17, 2025HouseFloor
    Third Reading, Measure passed: Ayes: 84 Nays: 0
  14. Mar 17, 2025House
    Title stricken
  15. Mar 17, 2025House
    Amended
  16. Mar 17, 2025House
    Coauthored by Representative(s) Archer
  17. Mar 17, 2025House
    General Order
  18. Mar 6, 2025House
    Authored by Senator Murdock (principal Senate author)
  19. Mar 6, 2025House
    Coauthored by Representative(s) Newton
  20. Mar 6, 2025HouseFloor
    CR; Do Pass Appropriations and Budget Committee
  21. Feb 17, 2025HouseFloor
    Recommendation to the full committee; Do Pass Appropriations and Budget Transportation Subcommittee
  22. Feb 7, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to Appropriations and Budget Transportation Subcommittee
  23. Feb 5, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to Appropriations and Budget
  24. Feb 5, 2025HouseCommittee
    Withdrawn from Rules Committee
  25. Feb 4, 2025HouseCommittee
    Second Reading referred to Rules
  26. Feb 3, 2025House
    Remove Representative Newton as principal House author and substitute with Representative Wilk
  27. Feb 3, 2025House
    Authored by Representative Newton
  28. Feb 3, 2025HouseIntroduced
    First Reading

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Mandatory Invasive Species Management

The legislation formalizes a statutory requirement for roadside vegetation management targeting specific ecological nuisances.

Connected Entities

Carl Newton, Nick Archer, Oklahoma Department of Transportation and 3 more
PersonCarl Newton“House sponsor of the bill.”Map →
PersonNick Archer“House sponsor of the bill.”Map →
OrganizationOklahoma Department of Transportation“Required to establish and implement the invasive species program.”Map →
PersonMurdock“Senate sponsor of the bill.”Map →
locationOklahoma“State where the law applies.”Map →
PersonWilk“House sponsor of the bill.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.oklegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 45)
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record