POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Hearing on Cybersecurity and Export Controls

Original title: WASSENAAR: CYBERSECURITY AND EXPORT CONTROLS

Record date · January 1, 2017

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is a transcript record of a joint congressional hearing held on January 12, 2016, regarding the intersection of cybersecurity and international export control agreements. The hearing examined how the —a multilateral export control regime—impacts the regulation of cybersecurity software and tools.

Why it matters

The hearing addresses how federal export regulations affect the ability of cybersecurity researchers and companies to share software tools internationally, which directly impacts the speed of global vulnerability discovery and digital security.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Cybersecurity researchers

Export controls can restrict the ability to share software tools and vulnerability research across international borders.

Directly affected

Technology companies

Companies must comply with federal export regulations when distributing cybersecurity software internationally.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on January 12, 2016, by two House subcommittees.
  • The primary subject was the impact of the Wassenaar Arrangement on cybersecurity export controls.
  • The Wassenaar Arrangement is a multilateral agreement governing the export of conventional arms and dual-use goods and technologies.
  • Witnesses included officials from the Department of State, Department of Commerce, and the Department of Homeland Security.
Show all 5 facts
  • The hearing record is identified as Serial No. 114-102 for the Oversight Committee and Serial No. 114-49 for the Homeland Security Committee.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Wassenaar Arrangement?
It is an international agreement among countries to coordinate for conventional weapons and technologies to promote regional and international security.
Why were these committees holding this hearing?
To examine how export control policies affect the cybersecurity industry and the ability of researchers to share information globally.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Cybersecurity as Dual-Use

The hearing highlights the transition of cybersecurity tools from purely commercial software to items categorized as 'dual-use' under international export regimes.

Connected Entities

Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies, Subcommittee on Information Technology, Cheri Flynn McGuire and 3 more
OrganizationSubcommittee on Information Technology“House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform”Map →
PersonCheri Flynn McGuire“Vice President, Global Government Affairs”Map →
PersonKevin J. Wolf“Assistant Secretary for Export Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce”Map →
PersonVann H. Van Diepen“Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Security and Nonprolifera”Map →
PersonPhyllis Schneck“Deputy Under Secretary for Cybersecurity and Communications, DHS”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record