POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Hearing on the Save Oak Flat Act (H.R. 1884)

Original title: H.R. 1884, ``SAVE OAK FLAT ACT''

January 1, 2022

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The bill seeks to repeal a previous federal mandate to transfer Oak Flat federal land to a private mining company, which would directly impact the future of copper mining operations and the preservation of land considered sacred by several Indigenous tribes.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Indigenous Tribes (e.g., San Carlos Apache, Navajo Nation)

The tribes consider the Oak Flat area sacred and are seeking to prevent its transfer and subsequent mining development.

Resolution Copper

The company is the intended recipient of the land transfer for the purpose of developing a copper mine.

Town of Superior, Arizona

The town's local economy and infrastructure are linked to the potential development of the mining project.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2022.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a 2021 House hearing regarding H.R. 1884, a bill intended to protect the Oak Flat area in Arizona from potential mining development. The hearing included testimony from tribal leaders, local government officials, and technical experts regarding the cultural and economic implications of the proposed legislation.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on April 13, 2021, by the Subcommittee for Indigenous Peoples of the United States.
  • H.R. 1884 aims to repeal the land transfer provision of the Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act of 2013.
  • The proposed land transfer involves federal land in the Tonto National Forest, known as Oak Flat, to Resolution Copper.
  • Tribal leaders testified regarding the cultural and religious significance of the Oak Flat area to Indigenous communities.
  • Local government officials and labor representatives submitted testimony regarding the potential economic impact of the mining project on the region.
  • The committee received numerous letters and statements for the record from various stakeholders, including the Navajo Nation, the San Carlos Apache Tribe, and local Arizona economic development groups.

Why It Matters

The bill seeks to repeal a previous federal mandate to transfer Oak Flat federal land to a private mining company, which would directly impact the future of copper mining operations and the preservation of land considered sacred by several Indigenous tribes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of H.R. 1884?
The bill seeks to stop the transfer of federal land at Oak Flat to a private mining company, effectively preventing the development of a large-scale copper mine at that site.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included the President of the Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, the President of the National Congress of American Indians, the Mayor of Superior, Arizona, and a technical expert from L. Everett & Associates.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Legislative Reversal

H.R. 1884 represents a direct attempt to reverse a specific land transfer mandate established by a previous Congress in 2013.

Connected Entities

personMila BesichMayor of the Town of Superior, Arizona.Map →
personRaul M. GrijalvaChair of the Committee on Natural Resources.Map →
personJames WellsChief Operating Officer of L. Everett & Associates.Map →
personTeresa Leger FernandezChair of the Subcommittee for Indigenous Peoples of the United States.Map →
personShan LewisPresident of the Inter Tribal Council of Arizona.Map →
personFawn SharpPresident of the National Congress of American Indians.Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy90
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record