POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Missouri House Bill 1970 Establishes Biometric Information Privacy Act to Regulate Data Collection

Original title: BIOMETRIC INFORMATION PRIVACY ACT

Last action · May 15, 2026: Referred: Emerging Issues(H)Sponsor: Doug Clemens

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

House Bill 1970 establishes the Biometric Information Privacy Act, requiring private entities to obtain before collecting s and prohibiting the sale, lease, or trade of such data.

Why it matters

Private businesses operating in Missouri face new legal liabilities and mandatory data destruction timelines when handling biometric data like fingerprints or facial scans, while individuals gain a private right of action in court for violations.

Background
  • The General Assembly is the legislative branch of the state of Missouri responsible for enacting state laws. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Private entities

Private businesses and corporations must establish written retention policies, obtain written releases before collecting biometric data, and comply with prohibitions on selling or disclosing biometric information.

Directly affected

Employees

Employees may be asked to execute a written release as a condition of employment for secure access or time tracking, and gain protections against unauthorized tracking of location or software usage.

Directly affected

Consumers

Consumers gain the right to receive written notice and provide consent before their biometric data is collected, and hold a private right of action for statutory damages if violations occur.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What types of data are excluded from the definition of a biometric identifier?
Exclusions include writing samples, written signatures, photographs or videos (unless data is generated from biological characteristics depicted within them), human biological samples for scientific testing, demographic data, tattoo descriptions, physical descriptions like height and weight, donated organs or blood, patient information in health care settings under HIPAA, and medical imaging like X-rays or MRIs.
Can an employer require a written release for biometric collection as a condition of employment?
Yes, an employer may secure a as a condition of employment, provided it is used strictly to permit access to secure physical locations and electronic hardware or software without tracking employee location or usage duration, or to record work hours and meal or rest breaks exceeding thirty minutes.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. May 15, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
  2. Jan 8, 2026HouseFloor
    Read Second Time (H)
  3. Jan 7, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read First Time (H)
  4. Dec 1, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Prefiled (H)

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Creation of Statutory Private Right of Action

The bill establishes a statutory right for individuals to file class actions or individual suits in state or federal court for biometric privacy violations with mandatory attorney fee shifting.

Connected Entities

General Assembly
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Legislative body of the state of Missouri”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz45
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record