POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofCrimes →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

South Dakota requires sealing of dismissed or frivolous protection order court files

Original title: require the sealing of court files upon dismissal or denial of a petition for a protection order.

Last action · March 30, 2026: Signed by the GovernorSponsors: Mike Stevens and 11 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

South Dakota law requires the immediate ing of court files and supporting documents when a protection order petition is dismissed without a hearing, and mandates sealing denied petitions if found to be , harassing, or without a basis in law or fact.

Why it matters

People involved in dismissed or unsupported protection order proceedings see their court files and associated law enforcement records removed from public view, affecting record transparency and privacy for both petitioners and respondents.

Background
  • Protection orders are civil court orders issued to protect individuals from domestic abuse, stalking, or physical harm. context

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Unified Judicial System

Must update electronic record maintenance procedures to apply court file sealing retroactively.

Directly affected

law enforcement

Must make any record of sealed protection order petitions nonpublic upon receiving notification from the court.

Directly affected

petitioners and respondents

Subject to having case files sealed from public view when petitions are dismissed without a hearing or denied as frivolous.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

When does the court automatically seal a protection order file?
The clerk of court must immediately the petition and supporting documents if the court dismisses a protection order petition without a hearing.
What happens if a protection order petition is denied after a hearing?
The court must the case if it makes a specific finding on the record that the petition had no basis in fact or law and was harassing, , or abusive.
Are older electronic court records affected by this law?
Yes, the Unified Judicial System is required to apply these ing provisions retroactively to all court records maintained electronically.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

14 actions
  1. Mar 30, 2026HouseEnrolled
    Signed by the Governor
  2. Mar 11, 2026HouseEnrolled
    Delivered to the Governor
  3. Mar 10, 2026Senate
    Signed by the President
  4. Mar 9, 2026House
    Signed by the Speaker
  5. Mar 5, 2026SenateCommittee
    Do Pass Amended
  6. Mar 3, 2026SenateCommittee
    Do Pass
Show 8 earlier actions
  1. Mar 3, 2026Senate
    Scheduled for hearing
  2. Feb 20, 2026SenateCommittee
    Referred to
  3. Feb 19, 2026SenateIntroduced
    First Reading Senate
  4. Feb 18, 2026HouseCommittee
    Do Pass Amended
  5. Feb 11, 2026HouseCommittee
    Do Pass Amended
  6. Feb 11, 2026House
    Motion to amend
  7. Feb 11, 2026House
    Scheduled for hearing
  8. Jan 22, 2026HouseIntroduced
    First read in House and referred to

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Voting Record

Motion succeededHouse2/18/2026South Dakota LegislatureOfficial roll call ↗

Do Pass Amended

Total

70

Yes
58
No
9
Present
0
Not voting
0
Abstain
0
Other positions
3

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Retroactive Sealing for Electronic Records

The legislation explicitly mandates retroactive application to electronically maintained records across the state Unified Judicial System.

Connected Entities

South Dakota Legislature, Unified Judicial System
OrganizationSouth Dakota Legislature“Enacting body for HB 1108”Map →
OrganizationUnified Judicial System“Required to apply provisions retroactively to electronic records”Map →

Sources

Open source document

sdlegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy35
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record