POLISCOPE
Back to feed
S3428FEDERALin_committee
High Impact

The DEFUND Act of 2023

Original title: DEFUND Act of 2023

December 10, 2025

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

Currently in_committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Last action
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.Dec 6, 2023
Lead sponsor

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

If passed, this bill would fundamentally alter U.S. foreign policy by ending all formal participation in the United Nations and its agencies, requiring the immediate cessation of all related federal funding and diplomatic agreements.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

United Nations

The organization would lose U.S. membership, funding, and diplomatic status within the United States.

U.S. Department of State

The agency would be responsible for executing the withdrawal and notifying the UN of the policy change.

UN personnel in the U.S.

These individuals would lose their diplomatic immunity and access to U.S. government facilities.

What changed

Current stage: in_committee.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Summary

This bill proposes that the United States terminate its membership in the United Nations and all affiliated bodies, including the World Health Organization. It would close the U.S. Mission to the UN, end all financial contributions, and revoke for UN personnel.

Key Facts

  • Repeals the United Nations Participation Act of 1945.
  • Mandates the termination of all U.S. membership in the UN and its specialized agencies.
  • Orders the closure of the United States Mission to the United Nations.
  • Repeals the United Nations Headquarters Agreement Act of 1947.
  • Prohibits all future assessed or voluntary financial contributions to the UN and its affiliated bodies.
  • Bans U.S. participation in any UN peacekeeping operations.
  • Prohibits the UN from occupying or using any U.S. government property.
  • Revokes diplomatic immunity for all UN officers, employees, and their families.
  • Repeals U.S. participation in the World Health Organization.
  • Requires the Secretary of State to formally notify the UN of these provisions.
  • Requires Senate advice and consent for any future U.S. reentry into the UN.
  • Allows for limited funding only to facilitate the withdrawal of personnel and equipment.

Why It Matters

If passed, this bill would fundamentally alter U.S. foreign policy by ending all formal participation in the United Nations and its agencies, requiring the immediate cessation of all related federal funding and diplomatic agreements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Would the U.S. still be able to join the UN in the future?
The bill does not permanently ban reentry, but it requires that any future membership agreement receive the of the Senate.
What happens to the UN headquarters in New York?
The bill mandates the withdrawal from the agreement regarding the headquarters and prohibits the UN from using U.S. government property.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Total Institutional Withdrawal

The bill targets not just membership, but the physical presence and legal protections of the UN within the U.S.

Connected Entities

personMike LeeSenator who introduced the billMap →
organizationUnited NationsThe primary international organization targeted for withdrawalMap →
organizationWorld Health OrganizationSpecific agency targeted for withdrawalMap →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance95
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy90
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment40
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz60
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record