Part ofsocial media →

FEDERALhearing transcript

High Impact

Senate Hearing on Social Media and Terrorism Prevention

Original title: TERRORISM AND SOCIAL MEDIA: #ISBIGTECHDOINGENOUGH?

January 1, 2018

social media terrorism content moderation national security technology policy

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing established the public record on how tech companies identify and remove extremist content, which informs potential future federal regulations regarding platform liability and standards.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Social Media Companies

These companies are subject to congressional oversight regarding their content moderation policies and potential future regulations.

Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

The committee is responsible for gathering information to determine if legislative action is required regarding tech platform policies.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2018.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation held a hearing on January 17, 2018, to examine how major social media companies address the use of their platforms by terrorist organizations. Representatives from Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter testified alongside national security experts regarding their current policies and counterterrorism efforts.

Key Facts

The hearing took place on January 17, 2018, before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
The session focused on the role of social media platforms in the spread of terrorist propaganda and recruitment.
Representatives from Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter provided testimony on their internal counterterrorism policies.
Clint Watts provided expert testimony on the intersection of social media algorithms and extremist activity.
The committee entered into the record a letter from civil rights and advocacy groups addressed to Facebook leadership regarding platform content.
The document includes written responses to follow-up questions submitted by committee members to the tech company representatives.
The committee reviewed an article regarding the use of algorithms to counter extremist content.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the primary goal of this hearing?

To evaluate whether major social media companies are doing enough to prevent their platforms from being used for terrorist activities.

Which companies testified at the hearing?

Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter.

Why It Matters

This hearing established the public record on how tech companies identify and remove extremist content, which informs potential future federal regulations regarding platform liability and standards.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Increased Congressional Scrutiny of Tech

The hearing marks a period of heightened legislative interest in the internal moderation policies of major social media platforms.

Facebook YouTube Twitter

Connected Entities

personJuniper Downs“Director of Public Policy and Government Relations at YouTube”Map →

personMonika Bickert“Head of Product Policy and Counterterrorism at Facebook”Map →

personJohn Thune“Chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation”Map →

personCarlos Monje, Jr.“Director of Public Policy and Philanthropy at Twitter”Map →

personClint Watts“Senior Fellow at the Center for Cyber and Homeland Security”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100

Significance80
How much this matters to a regular citizen
Controversy65
Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
Entertainment20
Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
Buzz30
Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools