The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Mississippi Senate proposes rule change to allow removal of Rules Committee members by caucus vote
Last action · April 15, 2026: 04/15 (S) Died In CommitteeSponsor: Kevin Blackwell
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Senate Resolution 4 proposes amending Senate Rule 65 to allow the removal of a Senator representing a congressional district on the Rules Committee at any time by a three-fourths caucus vote from their respective district.
Changes internal Senate disciplinary and administrative procedures by establishing a specific threshold for removing members from a powerful standing committee.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Senators
Senate members are subject to new removal thresholds regarding their service on the Rules Committee.
Rules Committee
The committee's composition stability is altered by introducing a mechanism for removing members via regional caucus votes.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
How can a member of the Rules Committee be removed under this resolution?
Who serves as the Chairman of the Rules Committee?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This resolution did not become law - Died in committee.
Procedural history
2 actions- Apr 15, 2026Senate04/15 (S) Died In Committee
- Jan 9, 2026SenateCommittee01/09 (S) Referred To Rules
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
billstatus.ls.state.ms.us
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 25)
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
