Senate Hearing on Countering the ISIS Threat
January 1, 2017
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The hearing establishes the federal government's 2016 strategic priorities for homeland security, specifically regarding the monitoring and mitigation of ISIS-related threats to the United States.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
The agency is responsible for implementing security measures discussed during the hearing.
U.S. Department of State
The agency coordinates international counterterrorism efforts and strategy.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing was held on May 26, 2016, by the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
- The committee identified four primary priorities: border security, cybersecurity, protection of critical infrastructure, and countering violent extremism.
- The committee noted that ISIS monthly revenues had decreased from approximately $80 million to $56 million.
- The hearing included testimony from the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of State.
- A joint strategy report on countering violent extremism from the Department of State and USAID was included in the appendix.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
Why It Matters
The hearing establishes the federal government's 2016 strategic priorities for homeland security, specifically regarding the monitoring and mitigation of ISIS-related threats to the United States.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Revenue Decline of ISIS
The committee explicitly cited a decline in ISIS monthly revenue from $80 million to $56 million as a key metric for assessing the threat.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools