POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Michigan Bill Requires Manufacturers to Provide Farm Equipment Repair Parts and Tools

Original title: Trade: business regulation; agricultural equipment repair act; create.

Last action · May 13, 2025: REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES AND AGRICULTURESponsors: Sue Shink and 6 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Beginning January 1, 2027, s and authorized repair providers of agricultural equipment in Michigan must make diagnostic, maintenance, and repair parts, tools, and documentation available to s and equipment owners at fair and reasonable costs.

Why it matters

Equipment owners and independent repair shops gain legal access to proprietary tools, diagnostic software, and repair manuals previously controlled solely by equipment manufacturers.

Background
  • Right-to-repair legislation for agricultural and consumer equipment has been introduced in multiple state legislatures to address repair monopolies by equipment manufacturers. context
  • Sue Shink serves as the primary sponsor of Senate Bill 302 in the Michigan Senate. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Owners of agricultural equipment

Equipment owners gain the legal right to purchase repair parts, tools, and documentation directly from manufacturers to service their own machinery.

Directly affected

Independent repair providers

Independent repair shops are legally entitled to obtain necessary diagnostic equipment, service manuals, and replacement parts on fair and reasonable terms.

Directly affected

Original equipment manufacturers

Manufacturers are required to make proprietary repair tools, parts, and documentation available to independent entities and equipment owners.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

When do these repair requirements take effect?
The requirements take effect on January 1, 2027.
Are manufacturers required to give up their trade secrets?
No, the act does not require s to divulge s.
What happens if a manufacturer knowingly violates a court order under this act?
An that knowingly violates the terms of an injunction, order, decree, or judgment is subject to a civil fine of not more than $25,000.00 for each violation.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. May 13, 2025SenateCommittee
    REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES AND AGRICULTURE
  2. May 13, 2025SenateIntroduced
    INTRODUCED BY SENATOR SUE SHINK

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Introduction of Right-to-Repair Mandates for Farm Equipment

The bill marks a significant regulatory shift by legally compelling agricultural equipment manufacturers to supply parts, tools, and documentation to independent parties.

Connected Entities

Stephanie Chang, Sue Shink, Erika Geiss and 5 more
PersonStephanie Chang“Cosponsor of SB 302”Map →
PersonSue Shink“Senate sponsor of SB 302”Map →
PersonErika Geiss“Cosponsor of SB 302”Map →
PersonJohn Cherry“Cosponsor of SB 302”Map →
PersonDayna Polehanki“Cosponsor of SB 302”Map →
locationIngham County“County where attorney general may bring certain actions if defendant is not esta”Map →
PersonRosemary Bayer“Cosponsor of SB 302”Map →
PersonEdward McBroom“Cosponsor of SB 302”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.mi.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record