POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofNasa →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Congressional Hearing on NASA Budget and Schedule Delays

Original title: NASA COST AND SCHEDULE OVERRUNS: ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES

Record date · January 1, 2018

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

The House Subcommittee on Space held a hearing on June 14, 2018, to examine challenges in NASA's management of large-scale space exploration programs, specifically focusing on recurring cost increases and schedule delays. Officials from NASA, the Government Accountability Office (GAO), and industry experts provided testimony on strategies and oversight.

Why it matters

This hearing addresses the management of taxpayer-funded space programs, which directly impacts the timeline and financial resources allocated to national human exploration missions.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

NASA

The agency is subject to congressional oversight regarding its acquisition and management processes.

Indirectly affected

Taxpayers

The efficiency of NASA's program management affects the allocation of federal funds.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on June 14, 2018, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
  • The hearing focused on 'NASA Cost and Schedule Overruns: Acquisition and Program Management Challenges'.
  • Testimony was provided by representatives from the GAO, NASA, and the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
  • The Subcommittee on Space is part of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Show all 5 facts
  • The hearing included an appendix with post-hearing questions and answers from the witnesses.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
To investigate why NASA programs frequently exceed their original budgets and timelines and to discuss potential improvements to and management practices.
Who testified at the hearing?
Officials from the GAO, NASA's Associate Administrator, NASA's Inspector General, and the Executive Director of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Acquisition Reform

The hearing highlights a sustained congressional effort to link NASA's exploration roadmap to stricter business and acquisition management standards.

Connected Entities

Daniel L. Dumbacher, Steve Jurczyk, Cristina Chaplain and 4 more
PersonDaniel L. Dumbacher“Executive Director, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics”Map →
PersonSteve Jurczyk“Associate Administrator, NASA”Map →
PersonCristina Chaplain“Director, GAO: Contracting and National Security Acquisitions”Map →
OrganizationNASA“Subject of the oversight hearing”Map →
PersonPaul Martin“Inspector General, NASA”Map →
OrganizationGovernment Accountability Office“Provided testimony on acquisition challenges”Map →
PersonBrian Babin“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Space”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy30
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record