POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Kentucky Senate Bill 48 revises mandatory reentry supervision eligibility and supervision rules for inmates

Original title: AN ACT relating to mandatory reentry supervision.

Last action · February 4, 2026: received in House to Committee on Committees (H)Sponsors: Brandon Storm and 5 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Kentucky Senate Bill 48 requires the parole board to order six months before an inmate's projected sentence completion date, while expanding exclusions and updating supervision conditions. The measure applies to eligible state inmates who have not been granted .

Why it matters

Changes which incarcerated individuals are released six months early under mandatory supervision and alters the rules governing their return to prison upon supervision violations.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

inmates

Ineligible or eligible inmates experience changes in their mandatory reentry supervision timeline, exclusion criteria, and supervision conditions.

Directly affected

parole board

The board must order mandatory reentry supervision without a hearing and adopt administrative regulations establishing general conditions.

Directly affected

department

The department must use risk and needs assessment results to establish supervision terms and report program results annually.

Key Facts

  • The board must order mandatory reentry supervision six months prior to the projected completion date of an inmate's sentence for those not granted discretionary parole.
  • Inmates are ineligible for mandatory reentry supervision if they are statutorily ineligible for parole, convicted of a capital offense or Class A felony, or classified as violent offenders under KRS 439.3401.
  • Additional exclusions from mandatory reentry supervision include inmates with maximum or close security classifications, those sentenced to two years or less of incarceration, and those subject to KRS 532.043.
  • Inmates with six months or less left to serve, those recommitted for supervision violations, and those who have twice been released on mandatory reentry supervision are also excluded.
Show all 9 facts
  • An inmate released to mandatory reentry supervision is considered released on parole and no hearing is required for the board to order it.
  • The department establishes terms and conditions of supervision using risk and needs assessment results, taking into account public safety risk and treatment needs.
  • The period of mandatory reentry supervision concludes upon completion of the individual's minimum expiration of sentence.
  • Inmates who abscond from supervision and are returned to prison do not receive credit toward the remainder of their sentence for the time spent absconding.
  • The department must report the results of the mandatory reentry supervision program to the Legislative Research Commission by February 1 of each year.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who qualifies for mandatory reentry supervision under Senate Bill 48?
Inmates who have not been granted and who meet the eligibility criteria qualify for six months prior to their projected sentence completion date, provided they do not fall under any statutory exclusions such as violent offender status or capital offense convictions.
Do inmates receive a hearing before being ordered to mandatory reentry supervision?
No hearing is required for the board to order an inmate to .
What happens if an inmate absconds from mandatory reentry supervision?
If the board issues a warrant for absconding and the inmate is returned to prison as a violator, the inmate does not receive sentence credit for the time spent absconding.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the Senate · in the House.

Procedural history

6 actions
  1. Feb 4, 2026HouseIntroduced
    received in House to Committee on Committees (H)
  2. Feb 3, 2026SenateFloor
    3rd reading, passed 38-0
  3. Jan 30, 2026SenateFloor
    2nd reading, to Rules posted for passage in the Regular Orders of the Day for Tuesday, February 03 2026
  4. Jan 29, 2026Senate
    reported favorably, 1st reading, to Calendar
  5. Jan 28, 2026SenateCommittee
    to Judiciary (S)
  6. Jan 7, 2026SenateIntroduced
    introduced in Senate to Committee on Committees (S)

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Legislative Research Commission, Interim Joint Committee on Judiciary, Brandon Storm and 6 more
OrganizationLegislative Research Commission“Receives annual reports on the mandatory reentry supervision program”Map →
OrganizationInterim Joint Committee on Judiciary“Legislative committee receiving program reports”Map →
PersonBrandon Storm“Primary sponsor of the bill”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“The legislative body enacting the bill”Map →
PersonDanny Carroll“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonDon Douglas“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonMatt Deneen“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonLindsey Tichenor“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonMike Wilson“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →

Sources

Open source document

apps.legislature.ky.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
  • Controversy30
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record