POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Senate Hearing on Transportation Agency Nominations

Original title: NOMINATION TO THE AMTRAK BOARD OF DIRECTORS, THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, THE FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, AND THE NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD

January 1, 2019

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing is a required step in the federal confirmation process for officials who will oversee national rail, trucking safety, and transportation research policies.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Nominees

The individuals are undergoing the Senate confirmation process required to assume their federal roles.

Transportation Industry

The industry is subject to the regulatory and policy decisions made by the agencies these nominees are slated to lead.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2019.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation held a hearing on October 31, 2017, to review four presidential s for key transportation roles. The committee evaluated candidates for positions at Amtrak, the Department of Transportation, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, and the National Transportation Safety Board.

Key Facts

  • The committee held a confirmation hearing for four executive branch nominees on October 31, 2017.
  • Leon A. Westmoreland was reviewed for the Amtrak Board of Directors.
  • Diana Furchtgott-Roth was reviewed for Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology at the U.S. Department of Transportation.
  • Raymond P. Martinez was reviewed for Administrator of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.
  • Bruce S. Landsberg was reviewed for a position on the National Transportation Safety Board.
  • The hearing included the submission of various letters of support and opposition regarding the nominees.
  • The record includes articles and statements concerning trade policy and workplace justice as they relate to the nominees' backgrounds.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing is part of the Senate's constitutional duty to provide '' on presidential nominations for key government positions.
Were the nominees confirmed at this meeting?
No, this document is a transcript of the hearing where the committee questioned the s; it does not record the final confirmation vote.

Why It Matters

This hearing is a required step in the federal confirmation process for officials who will oversee national rail, trucking safety, and transportation research policies.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference90% confidence

External Policy Influence

The hearing record includes external articles and letters regarding trade policy and workplace justice, indicating that committee members used the confirmation process to debate broader policy issues beyond the nominees' qualifications.

Connected Entities

organizationSenate Committee on Commerce, Science, and TransportationCommittee conducting the confirmation hearingMap →
personRaymond P. MartinezNominee for Administrator of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety AdministrationMap →
personDiana Furchtgott-RothNominee for Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology at the U.S. DepartmeMap →
personLeon A. WestmorelandNominee for Director of AmtrakMap →
personBruce S. LandsbergNominee for Member of the National Transportation Safety BoardMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy30
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record