The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Hearing on the Rapid DNA Act (H.R. 320)
Record date · January 1, 2015
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
This document is a transcript of a 2015 House Judiciary hearing regarding H.R. 320, the Act. The hearing featured testimony from FBI officials, crime lab administrators, and advocates regarding the use of rapid DNA analysis technology in criminal investigations.
The hearing explores the integration of testing into law enforcement procedures, which could change the speed and process by which criminal suspects are identified and processed through the justice system.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Law Enforcement Agencies
These agencies would be the primary users of rapid DNA technology for suspect identification.
Crime Laboratories
Laboratories would be responsible for implementing and managing the rapid DNA testing protocols.
Key Facts
- The hearing was held on June 18, 2015, by the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.
- The primary subject of the hearing was H.R. 320, titled the 'Rapid DNA Act'.
- Witnesses included representatives from the FBI, the American Society of Criminal Laboratory Directors, and Natasha's Justice Project.
- The hearing was conducted in the Rayburn House Office Building.
Show all 5 facts
- The subcommittee chairman, F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr., presided over the meeting.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Rapid DNA Act?
Who testified at this hearing?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceFull breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance60How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
