POLISCOPE
Back to feed
HR1605FEDERALFAILED
Did Not Advance

Natural Disaster Recovery Program Act of 2023

September 18, 2024

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

This resolution did not advance - its current status is "FAILED".

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

The bill would have changed how disaster recovery funds are distributed and monitored, specifically by allowing states and tribes more autonomy in prioritizing spending while requiring Congressional oversight of grant reports to prevent fraud.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

States

States would have been eligible to receive federal grants for disaster recovery and would have been subject to new reporting and procurement requirements.

Indian Tribes

Indian tribes would have been eligible to receive federal grants for disaster recovery and would have been subject to new reporting and procurement requirements.

Small Business Administration

The agency would have been required to coordinate with the President to provide data on disaster recovery needs.

What changed

Current stage: FAILED.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This bill would have created a new federal program to provide disaster recovery grants to states and Indian tribes for long-term needs like housing, infrastructure, and economic revitalization. It required the President to coordinate disaster data across agencies and mandated that grantees spend a portion of funds on cleaning rivers and streams.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who would have been eligible for these grants?
States and Indian tribes would have been eligible to receive grants for s following a major disaster declaration.
How would the government ensure the money wasn't wasted?
The bill required grantees to submit a report on spending to Congress, certified by a State Auditor, before receiving the second half of their grant funds.
Could grantees use the money for administrative costs?
Yes, but they would have been limited to using no more than 13 percent of the grant for administrative costs, such as audits and oversight.

Why It Matters

The bill would have changed how disaster recovery funds are distributed and monitored, specifically by allowing states and tribes more autonomy in prioritizing spending while requiring Congressional oversight of grant reports to prevent fraud.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

organizationSmall Business AdministrationCoordinated data collection with this agency.Map →
bill_numberRobert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance ActThe foundational law this bill amends.Map →
organizationStatesPrimary recipients of disaster assistance.Map →
personPresidentHas the authority to provide disaster assistance.Map →
organizationIndian TribesEligible recipients of disaster assistance.Map →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record