Congressional Hearing on Child Nutrition Program Oversight
January 1, 2016
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This hearing serves as a formal oversight mechanism to evaluate the integrity of federal programs that provide meals to children, which impacts how taxpayer funds are managed and how nutrition services are delivered to students.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
U.S. Department of Agriculture
The agency is responsible for implementing the programs under review and responding to audit findings.
School districts
Districts are subject to the federal regulations and oversight procedures discussed in the hearing.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on May 19, 2015, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
- The subcommittee focused on identifying waste, fraud, and abuse in federal child nutrition programs.
- Testimony was provided by representatives from the GAO, the USDA Office of Inspector General, and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
- The hearing record includes written statements and responses to follow-up questions from witnesses.
- Additional questions for the record were submitted by Representatives Carlos Curbelo and John Kline.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
Why It Matters
This hearing serves as a formal oversight mechanism to evaluate the integrity of federal programs that provide meals to children, which impacts how taxpayer funds are managed and how nutrition services are delivered to students.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Show 1 more sponsor
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Historical Oversight Record
The document serves as a formal record of 2015 oversight activities regarding USDA nutrition programs.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance40How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools