POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Idaho House Bill 835 revises expenditure limits and approval rules for non-cognizable state funds and interagency billings

Original title: STATE BUDGET – Amends existing law to revise provisions regarding expenditures made pursuant to certain funds that are not cognizable.

Last action · March 27, 2026: Reported out of committee; to 14th Order for amendment

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Idaho House Bill 835 amends state budget laws to cap cumulative expenditures from funds at $10 million per , establishes rules for , and declares an emergency for the law to take effect on July 1, 2026.

Why it matters

State agencies and departments face a strict $10 million annual ceiling on spending from unbudgeted non-state funds unless specific emergency, military construction, or student tuition exemptions apply.

Background
  • House Bill 835 was introduced by the Appropriations Committee during the Second Regular Session of the Sixty-eighth Idaho Legislature. context
  • Idaho Code Section 67-3516 governs the rate of expenditure and fixed budget parameters for state agencies and institutions. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

State Officers and Departments

State officers and departments are bound by fixed budget limits and must secure specific administrative approvals to spend non-cognizable funds or execute interagency billings.

Directly affected

Division of Financial Management

The administrator of the division of financial management is granted authority to review, approve, and oversee non-cognizable fund expenditures, capital asset receipts, and interagency transactions.

Directly affected

Board of Examiners

The board of examiners shares the responsibility of granting prior approval for agencies to expend unbudgeted or non-cognizable moneys.

Key Facts

  • Appropriation acts passed by the Idaho legislature are fixed budgets that state officers, departments, bureaus, and institutions may not exceed.
  • Moneys available to an agency from non-state sources that are not cognizable at the time appropriations were made require prior approval from the administrator of the division of financial management and the board of examiners to be expended.
  • Receipts from the sale of capital outlay items and insurance claim settlements may be included as an increase to an agency's appropriation with the approval of the division of financial management.
  • Proceeds from the sale of a motor vehicle may be transferred to operating expenditures with the approval of the division of financial management.
Show all 9 facts
  • Cumulative expenditures from non-cognizable funds cannot exceed $10,000,000 in any fiscal year.
  • Exempted from the $10 million cap are funds expended for declared federal or state emergencies, construction at the orchard combat training center or Gowen field funded by the federal national guard bureau, or tuition costs for Idaho students at public higher education institutions.
  • State agencies selling goods and services to another state agency must use the interagency billing process, requiring prior written approval or statutory authorization.
  • The state controller must treat interagency receipts as revenue rather than a reduction of expenditures for the receiving agency.
  • This act declares an emergency and takes effect on July 1, 2026.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the maximum amount of non-cognizable funds a state agency can spend in a fiscal year?
Cumulative expenditures made pursuant to funds shall not exceed ten million dollars ($10,000,000) in any , subject to specific exemptions.
Are there exceptions to the $10 million spending cap on non-cognizable funds?
Yes, the cap excludes funds expended for declared federal or state emergencies, national guard bureau-funded construction projects at the orchard combat training center or Gowen field, and tuition costs for Idaho students at public higher education institutions.
Who must approve the expenditure of non-cognizable moneys available to an agency?
Expenditures require prior approval from the administrator of the division of financial management and the board of examiners, unless received under conditions precluding such approval.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed both. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

8 actions
  1. Mar 27, 2026
    Reported out of committee; to 14th Order for amendment
  2. Mar 16, 2026Introduced
    Introduced, read first time; referred to: State Affairs
  3. Mar 16, 2026Floor
    Received from the House passed; filed for first reading
  4. Mar 13, 2026Floor
    Rules Suspended: Ayes 68 Nays 0 Abs/Excd 2, read in full as required – PASSED - 62-7-1 AYES – Alfieri, Barbieri, Beiswenger, Berch, Bingham, Boyle, Bruce, Burgoyne, Cannon, Cayler, Cheatum, Cornilles, Crane(12), Crane(13), Dygert, Ehardt, Ehlers, Erickson(Larsen), Fuhriman, Furniss, Gannon, Garner, Green, Hall(Stone), Harris, Hawkins, Healey, Hill, Holtzclaw, Hostetler, Leavitt, Manwaring, Marmon, McCann, Mendive, Mickelsen, Miller, Mitchell, Monks, Nelsen, Petzke, Pickett, Pohanka, Price, Rasor, Raybould, Raymond, Redman, Sauter, Scott, Shepherd, Shirts, Skaug, Tanner(13), Tanner(14), Thompson, Vander Woude, Veile, Weber, Wheeler, Wisniewski, Mr. Speaker NAYS – Church, Egbert, Galaviz, Handy, Haws, Mathias, Rubel Absent – Palmer Floor Sponsor - Monks Title apvd - to Senate
  5. Mar 13, 2026
    Read second time; Filed for Third Reading
  6. Mar 12, 2026
    Reported out of Committee with Do Pass Recommendation, Filed for Second Reading
Show 2 earlier actions
  1. Mar 6, 2026Committee
    Reported Printed and Referred to Appropriations
  2. Mar 5, 2026Introduced
    Introduced, read first time, referred to JRA for Printing

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Establishment of a Hard Cap on Non-Cognizable Funds

The legislation introduces a firm $10 million ceiling on cumulative expenditures from unbudgeted non-state funds, adding strict oversight criteria.

Connected Entities

Appropriations Committee, Gowen Field, Division of Financial Management and 4 more
OrganizationAppropriations Committee“Committee that introduced House Bill No. 835”Map →
locationGowen Field“Location of construction projects funded through the federal national guard bure”Map →
OrganizationDivision of Financial Management“Division whose administrator grants approval for certain agency expenditures”Map →
locationOrchard Combat Training Center“Location of construction projects funded through the federal national guard bure”Map →
OrganizationState Controller“State officer responsible for treating interagency receipts as revenue and provi”Map →
OrganizationHouse of Representatives“Chamber where House Bill No. 835 was introduced”Map →
OrganizationBoard of Examiners“Board required to give prior approval for expending certain moneys available to ”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.idaho.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record