POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Military Assessment of U.S. Nuclear Deterrence Requirements

Original title: [H.A.S.C. No. 115-11]Military Assessment of Nuclear Deterrence Requirements

January 1, 2017

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing addresses the long-term maintenance and modernization requirements for the U.S. nuclear arsenal, which impacts federal defense spending and national security policy.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

U.S. Department of Defense

The department is responsible for the maintenance, operation, and modernization of the nuclear triad systems discussed.

U.S. Taxpayers

Taxpayers fund the maintenance and potential modernization of the nuclear arsenal.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript from a 2017 House Armed Services Committee hearing regarding the state of the U.S. nuclear deterrent. Military leaders and committee members discussed the aging status of the nuclear —land-based missiles, bombers, and submarines—and the challenges of maintaining these systems.

Key Facts

  • The U.S. nuclear deterrent consists of a triad: land-based missiles, bombers, and ballistic missile submarines.
  • Minuteman III missiles were first fielded in 1970.
  • B-52 bombers were first deployed in the 1950s; B-2 bombers were first deployed in the 1980s.
  • Ballistic missile submarines currently in service began entering service in 1981.
  • Most nuclear warheads in the U.S. arsenal were designed and built in the 1970s or earlier.
  • The last full test of a U.S. nuclear warhead occurred in 1991.
  • The hearing was held on March 8, 2017, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
  • The committee identified that nuclear command and control systems have not received sufficient recent attention.

Why It Matters

The hearing addresses the long-term maintenance and modernization requirements for the U.S. nuclear arsenal, which impacts federal defense spending and national security policy.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the 'nuclear triad' mentioned in the hearing?
The nuclear refers to the three methods of delivering nuclear weapons: land-based missiles, bombers, and ballistic missile submarines.
Why is the committee concerned about the age of nuclear systems?
The committee noted that the delivery systems and warheads are decades old, and the facilities and workforce maintaining them are aging, which they argue creates challenges for maintaining a credible deterrent.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Aging Infrastructure

The hearing highlights a shift in focus toward the 'aging workforce' and 'neglected facilities' as a primary risk factor for nuclear readiness, rather than just the weapons themselves.

Connected Entities

personPaul J. SelvaGeneral, USAF, Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of StaffMap →
personStephen W. WilsonGeneral, USAF, Vice Chief of Staff of the Air ForceMap →
personJohn E. HytenGeneral, USAF, Commander of U.S. Strategic CommandMap →
personWilliam M. 'Mac' ThornberryChairman of the House Committee on Armed ServicesMap →
organizationHouse Committee on Armed ServicesCongressional committee conducting the hearingMap →
personWilliam F. MoranAdmiral, USN, Vice Chief of Naval OperationsMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record