POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofFEMA
FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Hearing on FEMA's Role in Local Land-Use Decisions

Original title: AN EXAMINATION OF THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY'S LIMITED ROLE IN LOCAL LAND-USE DEVELOPMENT DECISIONS

January 1, 2017

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing addresses the tension between federal flood safety mandates and local control over land development, which directly affects building permits, insurance costs, and infrastructure planning for residents in flood-prone areas.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Local property owners

Changes in FEMA land-use policies can alter flood insurance requirements and building permit eligibility for property owners.

Home builders

Federal land-use mandates influence the feasibility and cost of development projects in flood-prone regions.

Local governments

Municipalities must align local zoning and development codes with federal flood insurance standards to maintain program eligibility.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure held a hearing on September 21, 2016, to examine the extent of FEMA's influence on local land-use and development planning. The discussion focused on how federal flood insurance requirements and s impact local development projects.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on September 21, 2016, before the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
  • The central topic was the scope of FEMA's authority in local land-use and development decisions.
  • The committee reviewed the impact of the National Marine Fisheries Service's biological opinion on FEMA's National Flood Insurance Program.
  • Correspondence was submitted from Oregon Governor Kate Brown and Representative Peter DeFazio expressing concerns over FEMA's implementation of 'reasonable and prudent alternatives' related to environmental mandates.
  • Witnesses included representatives from FEMA, the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development, the City of Beaverton, the National Association of Counties, and the National Association of Home Builders.

Why It Matters

This hearing addresses the tension between federal flood safety mandates and local control over land development, which directly affects building permits, insurance costs, and infrastructure planning for residents in flood-prone areas.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main conflict discussed in this hearing?
The hearing examines whether FEMA is overstepping its authority by influencing local land-use decisions through its administration of the National Flood Insurance Program and environmental compliance requirements.
Who testified at this hearing?
Witnesses included FEMA's Assistant Administrator for , local government officials from Oregon and Florida, and representatives from home builder associations.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Federal-Local Tension

The hearing highlights a recurring conflict where federal environmental protections (biological opinions) force changes to local land-use policies, creating friction between federal agencies and local municipalities.

Connected Entities

personMichael GrimmAssistant Administrator for Mitigation at FEMA.Map →
organizationFederal Emergency Management AgencyThe primary federal agency under review regarding its role in land-use decisionsMap →
personKate BrownGovernor of Oregon who submitted correspondence regarding FEMA's implementation Map →
personBill ShusterChairman of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.Map →
personPeter A. DeFazioRanking Member of the Committee who requested the hearing.Map →
organizationNational Marine Fisheries ServiceAgency responsible for the biological opinion impacting FEMA's flood insurance pMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record