POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Missouri bill bans ICE agents from wearing masks or concealing identity during operations

Original title: FEDERAL IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT OPERATIONS

Last action · May 15, 2026: Referred: Emerging Issues(H)Sponsors: Ray Reed and 5 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents operating in Missouri are prohibited from concealing their identity or wearing facial coverings, with specific exceptions for medical masks, hazardous environments, and active undercover work. A willful and knowing violation of this requirement is punishable as a .

Why it matters

Federal immigration enforcement personnel operating within the state face criminal misdemeanor charges and modified operational protocols if they obscure their facial identity without meeting statutory exemptions.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

federal law enforcement agents performing Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations

Federal immigration agents are prohibited from wearing facial coverings during operations unless meeting specific exemptions, under threat of criminal penalties.

Key Facts

  • ICE agents performing operations in Missouri are prohibited from concealing their identity or wearing facial coverings that obscure facial identity.
  • A facial covering is defined as any opaque mask, garment, helmet, headgear, balaclava, tactical mask, gaiter, ski mask, or face-shielding item.
  • Exempted face wear includes translucent face shields, medical masks (N95 or surgical), protective gear against toxins or hazardous conditions, underwater breathing apparatuses, motorcycle helmets, and protective eyewear against lasers.
  • The restriction does not apply to agents performing duties as undercover operatives or agents assigned to a Special Response Team (SRT) while actively performing SRT responsibilities.
Show all 5 facts
  • A willful and knowing violation of the statute is classified and punishable as a class A misdemeanor.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are ICE agents allowed to wear medical masks under this bill?
Yes, N95 medical masks, surgical masks, and respirators worn to protect against disease, infection, toxins, gas, smoke, or hazardous environmental conditions are explicitly exempted.
What is the penalty if an ICE agent violates this rule?
A willful and knowing violation of the section is punishable as a .

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. May 15, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
  2. Jan 8, 2026HouseFloor
    Read Second Time (H)
  3. Jan 7, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read First Time (H)
  4. Dec 18, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Prefiled (H)

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Joseph Engler, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Missouri
PersonJoseph Engler“Chief Clerk of the House.”Map →
OrganizationImmigration and Customs Enforcement“Federal agency whose agents' operations are subject to facial covering restricti”Map →
locationMissouri“State where the legislation applies.”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy85
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz50
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record