Senate Hearing on the Future of Highway Funding
January 1, 2016
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The hearing addresses the structural deficit in the , which determines how the federal government pays for road and bridge construction and maintenance across the country.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
State Departments of Transportation
These agencies rely on federal highway funding to plan and execute infrastructure projects.
Construction and Engineering Industry
These groups are impacted by the availability and stability of federal infrastructure spending.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing was held on June 18, 2015, by the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance.
- The primary subject was the financial challenges facing the future of highway funding.
- The committee received testimony from the Congressional Budget Office, former Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood, and economist Stephen Moore.
- The hearing record includes numerous submissions from industry groups, including the American Society of Civil Engineers and the National Association of Manufacturers.
Why It Matters
The hearing addresses the structural deficit in the , which determines how the federal government pays for road and bridge construction and maintenance across the country.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at this hearing?
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Long-standing Infrastructure Funding Concerns
The hearing highlights that concerns regarding the sustainability of the Highway Trust Fund have been a major focus of the Senate Finance Committee for at least a decade.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools