POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Utah Bill Requires Patient Notice Before Enforcing Nondisclosure Clauses Regarding Health Care Providers

Original title: Health Care Patient Reporting to the Division of Professional Licensing

Last action · March 26, 2026: Governor VetoedSponsors: Stephanie Gricius and 2 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

This bill addresses nondisclosure clauses and required disclosures that must be made to a patient regarding reporting to the Division of Professional Licensing.

Why it matters

Patients signing settlement or confidentiality agreements with health care providers retain the legal right to report professional misconduct to state regulators, provided providers fulfill prior notice requirements.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Health care providers

Providers must supply written complaint information upon receiving misconduct disclosures and must deliver a model notice prior to executing any patient nondisclosure clause for it to be valid.

Directly affected

Patients

Patients receive explicit written information on reporting options and retain their ability to report provider conduct to state regulators despite confidentiality agreements, unless proper advance notice is given.

Directly affected

Division of Professional Licensing

The division must create, publish online, and administer a model notice regarding the reporting of professional misconduct.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is required for a patient nondisclosure clause to be valid?
For a executed after June 1, 2025, to be valid, the licensed health care provider must give the patient or personal representative the division's model notice before the contract is executed.
What information must the Division of Professional Licensing include on the model notice?
The model notice must include information about a patient's option to report misconduct, details on what constitutes , the reporting process, and a reference to Section 58-1-501.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Vetoed by the governor.

Procedural history

47 actions
  1. Mar 26, 2026Lieutenant Governor's office for filing
    Governor Vetoed
  2. Mar 3, 2026House
    House/ to Governor
  3. Mar 3, 2026House
    House/ received enrolled bill from Printing
  4. Feb 25, 2026House
    House/ enrolled bill to Printing
  5. Feb 25, 2026Clerk of the House
    Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate
  6. Feb 24, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel / Enrolling
    Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared
Show 41 earlier actions
  1. Feb 24, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel / Enrolling
    Bill Received from House for Enrolling
  2. Feb 20, 2026House
    House/ signed by Speaker/ sent for enrolling
  3. Feb 20, 2026House
    House/ received from Senate
  4. Feb 20, 2026Senate
    Senate/ to House
  5. Feb 20, 2026Senate
    Senate/ signed by President/ returned to House
  6. Feb 20, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received from House
  7. Feb 20, 2026House
    House/ to Senate
  8. Feb 20, 2026House
    House/ concurs with Senate amendment
  9. Feb 19, 2026House
    House/ placed on Concurrence Calendar
  10. Feb 19, 2026House
    House/ received from Senate
  11. Feb 19, 2026Senate
    Senate/ to House with amendments
  12. Feb 19, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate/ passed 3rd reading
  13. Feb 19, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 3rd reading
  14. Feb 13, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 2nd reading
  15. Feb 13, 2026Senate
    Senate/ comm rpt/ substituted/ Consent Calendar
  16. Feb 12, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Consent Calendar Recommendation
  17. Feb 12, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  18. Feb 12, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Substitute Recommendation
  19. Feb 8, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0164S01
  20. Feb 8, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0164S01
  21. Feb 5, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0164S01
  22. Feb 5, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0164S01
  23. Feb 4, 2026SenateCommittee
    Senate/ to standing committee
  24. Feb 3, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  25. Feb 2, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received from House
  26. Feb 2, 2026House
    House/ to Senate
  27. Feb 2, 2026HouseFloor
    House/ passed 3rd reading
  28. Feb 2, 2026House
    House/ 3rd reading
  29. Jan 23, 2026House
    House/ 2nd reading
  30. Jan 23, 2026House
    House/ committee report favorable
  31. Jan 22, 2026House
    House Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  32. Jan 21, 2026HouseCommittee
    House/ to standing committee
  33. Jan 20, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  34. Jan 20, 2026House
    House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  35. Jan 16, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0164
  36. Jan 16, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0164
  37. Jan 14, 2026House
    House/ received bill from Legislative Research
  38. Jan 7, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0164
  39. Jan 7, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0164
  40. Jan 7, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  41. Jan 7, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Voting Record

Motion succeededHouse2/2/2026Utah LegislatureOfficial roll call ↗

House/ passed 3rd reading

Total

75

Yes
72
No
0
Present
0
Not voting
3
Abstain
0

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Conditional Nondisclosure Enforceability

The legislation ties the legal enforceability of patient confidentiality agreements directly to the advance delivery of a state-provided administrative notice.

Connected Entities

Division of Professional Licensing, Department of Commerce
OrganizationDivision of Professional Licensing“State agency responsible for licensing and receiving complaints regarding health”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Commerce“State department housing the Division of Professional Licensing.”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record