POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Kansas bill authorizes cities and counties to propose nonresident earnings tax of up to 1% for ballot approval

Original title: AN ACT concerning taxation; relating to income tax; authorizing cities and counties to propose an earnings tax for ballot question and to levy such tax upon nonresidents of the city or county if approved by the electors of a city or county; requiring resubmission of the question, if approved, to the electors every 10 years thereafter; allowing certain credits and exemptions against such tax; providing for the deduction by public and private employers of such tax from employee earnings; providing for revenue to be pledged for certain purposes; amending K.S.A. 12-140 and K.S.A. 2024 Supp. 19-101a and repealing the existing sections.

Last action · April 10, 2026: Died in Committee

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Senate Bill 103 empowers Kansas cities and counties to levy an earnings tax of up to 1% annually on nonresidents working within their boundaries, subject to voter approval in a local referendum. The measure requires the continuation question to be resubmitted to every 10 years and mandates that at least 50% of the revenue be used to reduce property taxes.

Why it matters

Nonresidents employed within participating Kansas cities or counties face up to a 1% tax on wages, while property owners see a required reduction in es funded by at least half of the new revenue.

Background
  • Kansas law historically prohibited cities and counties from levying local income or earnings taxes, reserving income taxation for the state level. context
  • Senate Bill 103 was introduced during the 2025-2026 legislative session and ultimately died in committee. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Nonresident Workers

Nonresident individuals employed within a participating city or county face a tax of up to 1% on their salaries, wages, and commissions.

Directly affected

Public and Private Employers

Employers within a taxing jurisdiction may be mandated to deduct the tax from employee earnings, remit collections, and submit nonresident employee lists upon request.

Directly affected

Local Property Owners

Property owners benefit from mandatory budget credits utilizing at least 50% of earnings tax revenue to reduce ad valorem property tax levies.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who would be required to pay the proposed earnings tax?
The earnings tax applies only to individuals who are not residents of the city or county levying the tax, but who are employed or working within that city or county.
What happens to the money collected from the earnings tax?
For cities, the revenue must be pledged for infrastructure purposes, with at least 50% used to reduce es. For counties, revenue goes to general county purposes, with at least 50% also credited to reduce property taxes.
How often must voters re-approve the earnings tax if it passes?
Once an earnings tax is initially approved and levied, the question of whether to continue it must be submitted to the voters every 10 years.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died in committee.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Apr 10, 2026Senate
    Died in Committee
  2. Jan 30, 2025SenateCommittee
    Referred to Senate Committee on Assessment and Taxation
  3. Jan 29, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Introduced

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift99% confidence

Repeal of Longstanding Income Tax Prohibition

The bill explicitly amends K.S.A. 12-140 and K.S.A. 2024 Supp. 19-101a to carve out an exception to the blanket prohibition preventing Kansas cities and counties from levying income taxes.

Connected Entities

Kansas Department of Health and Environment, State Corporation Commission, Senate Committee on Assessment and Taxation
OrganizationKansas Department of Health and Environment“State agency referenced in statutory limitations on county powers”Map →
OrganizationState Corporation Commission“State commission referenced in oil and gas well regulatory limitations”Map →
OrganizationSenate Committee on Assessment and Taxation“Legislative committee sponsoring Senate Bill 103”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.kslegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy85
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record