POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Oklahoma House Bill 1563 Authorizes Subpoenas Duces Tecum for Businesses and Sets Discovery Timelines

Original title: Criminal procedure; authorizing the issuance of subpoena duces tecum to businesses and commercial entities; codification; effective date.

Last action · May 29, 2025: Filed with Secretary of State

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

This law authorizes criminal defendants to issue subpoenas duces tecum to businesses and commercial entities for records, requires law enforcement to provide specific arrest videos to prosecutors within 30 days, and mandates prosecutors disclose those records to defendants within 90 days starting November 1, 2025.

Why it matters

Defendants gain statutory authority to subpoena private commercial records for trial preparation, while law enforcement and prosecutors must adhere to strict new deadlines for handling body camera footage and sobriety test recordings.

Background
  • House Bill 1563 amends Oklahoma criminal procedure statutes governing subpoenas duces tecum and the Oklahoma Criminal Discovery Code. context
  • The measure establishes specific statutory windows for the transfer of body camera and arrest footage between law enforcement, prosecutors, and defense counsel. context

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Criminal defendants

Defendants gain explicit statutory authority to issue business subpoenas and receive mandatory law enforcement video evidence within specified timelines.

Directly affected

Law enforcement agencies

Agencies must produce specific arrest and sobriety recordings to prosecutors within 30 days or face potential punishment by contempt.

Directly affected

Prosecuting agencies

Prosecutors must disclose law enforcement records to defendants within 90 days and maintain tracking records for jailhouse informant agreements.

Directly affected

Businesses and commercial entities

Commercial entities are subject to receiving subpoenas duces tecum issued by defendants for the production of documents or recordings.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a defendant subpoena a private business for records under this law?
Yes. Defendants are authorized to issue a to a business or commercial entity for the production of books, papers, documents, or recordings.
What is the deadline for law enforcement to hand over arrest videos to prosecutors?
Law enforcement must provide body camera videos, vehicle-mounted camera videos, and sobriety test recordings within thirty days of the filing of an endorsed complaint, , or information.
Who pays for copying costs if a defendant is indigent?
If the court determines the defendant is indigent and without funds to pay for reproduction costs, the expenses will be paid by the Indigent Defender System.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Became law over the governor's veto.

Procedural history

44 actions
  1. May 29, 2025House
    Filed with Secretary of State
  2. May 29, 2025Senate
    Measure returned to House
  3. May 29, 2025Senate
    Veto overridden: Ayes: 45 Nays: 0
  4. May 29, 2025House
    To Senate
  5. May 29, 2025House
    Veto overridden: Ayes: 82 Nays: 4
  6. May 28, 2025House
    Vetoed 05/28/2025
Show 38 earlier actions
  1. May 22, 2025House
    Sent to Governor
  2. May 22, 2025Senate
    Enrolled measure signed, returned to House
  3. May 22, 2025House
    Enrolled, signed, to Senate
  4. May 21, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred for enrollment
  5. May 21, 2025SenateFloor
    Measure passed, to House: Ayes: 46 Nays: 0
  6. May 21, 2025SenateFloor
    CCR adopted
  7. May 21, 2025Senate
    CCR read
  8. May 21, 2025House
    To Senate
  9. May 21, 2025HouseFloor
    Fourth Reading, Measure passed: Ayes: 85 Nays: 4
  10. May 21, 2025HouseFloor
    CCR adopted
  11. May 20, 2025House
    Title restored
  12. May 20, 2025House
    CCR submitted
  13. May 15, 2025Senate
    Conference granted, SCs named Howard, Gollihare, Jech, Rosino, Thompson, Brooks
  14. May 15, 2025HouseCommittee
    HC's named: Conference Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight
  15. May 14, 2025House
    SA's rejected, conference requested, conferees to be named later
  16. May 1, 2025House
    SA's received
  17. May 1, 2025Senate
    Engrossed to House
  18. Apr 30, 2025SenateCommittee
    Referred for engrossment
  19. Apr 30, 2025SenateFloor
    Measure passed: Ayes: 26 Nays: 18
  20. Apr 30, 2025Senate
    General Order, Considered
  21. Apr 24, 2025Senate
    Placed on General Order
  22. Apr 22, 2025SenateFloor
    Reported Do Pass, amended by committee substitute Judiciary committee; CR filed
  23. Apr 1, 2025SenateCommittee
    Second Reading referred to Judiciary
  24. Mar 31, 2025SenateIntroduced
    First Reading
  25. Mar 31, 2025House
    Engrossed, signed, to Senate
  26. Mar 27, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred for engrossment
  27. Mar 27, 2025HouseFloor
    Third Reading, Measure passed: Ayes: 77 Nays: 8
  28. Mar 27, 2025House
    Title stricken
  29. Mar 27, 2025House
    Amended
  30. Mar 27, 2025House
    Amended by floor substitute
  31. Mar 27, 2025House
    General Order
  32. Mar 4, 2025House
    Authored by Senator Howard (principal Senate author)
  33. Mar 4, 2025HouseFloor
    CR; Do Pass, amended by committee substitute Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight Committee
  34. Feb 17, 2025HouseFloor
    Policy recommendation to the Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight committee; Do Pass, amended by committee substitute Civil Judiciary
  35. Feb 4, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to Civil Judiciary
  36. Feb 4, 2025HouseCommittee
    Second Reading referred to Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight
  37. Feb 3, 2025House
    Authored by Representative Duel
  38. Feb 3, 2025HouseIntroduced
    First Reading

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Codified Discovery Deadlines for Law Enforcement

The legislation establishes fixed statutory timelines (30 days for police to provide videos, 90 days for prosecutors to turn them over) backed by potential contempt penalties for non-compliance.

Connected Entities

Duel, Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation, Howard and 2 more
PersonDuel“House sponsor of HB 1563”Map →
OrganizationOklahoma State Bureau of Investigation“State agency conducting background checks and rap sheet searches”Map →
PersonHoward“Senate sponsor of HB 1563”Map →
OrganizationDistrict Attorneys Council“State council maintaining statewide records of jailhouse informants”Map →
OrganizationIndigent Defender System“System responsible for paying reproduction costs for indigent defendants”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.oklegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record