POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Utah establishes civil right of action for unauthorized disclosure of intimate images

Original title: Uniform Intimate Images Amendments

Last action · March 23, 2026: Governor SignedSponsors: Mike McKell and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Utah enacts the Uniform Civil Remedies for Unauthorized Disclosure of s Act, allowing identifiable individuals to sue for damages when private intimate images are shared without consent, effective May 6, 2026.

Why it matters

Residents gain a direct legal path to seek economic, emotional distress, or up to $10,000 against individuals who intentionally distribute private sexual images without permission, while online service providers and law enforcement acting in good faith retain specific liability protections.

Background
  • The Uniform Civil Remedies for Unauthorized Disclosure of Intimate Images Act is a model law designed to provide consistent civil legal remedies across states for victims of non-consensual image sharing. context

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Depicted individuals

Individuals have a newly established civil right of action to sue for unauthorized disclosures of their private intimate images and seek multiple forms of damages.

Directly affected

Online service providers

Providers are granted statutory protection from liability under this part when they merely transmit, store, or provide access to images they did not create.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What can a plaintiff recover in a civil action under this law?
A prevailing plaintiff may recover economic and noneconomic damages (including emotional distress), up to $10,000, any monetary gain made by the defendant, punitive damages, and reasonable attorney fees and costs.
Are online service providers held liable under this act?
No, online service providers are not liable solely for providing access to, transmitting, downloading, storing, or connecting users to an if they did not create the image.
What is the time limit for bringing a lawsuit under this statute?
An action for an unauthorized disclosure must be brought within four years after the day on which the disclosure was discovered or should have been discovered with reasonable diligence.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

42 actions
  1. Mar 23, 2026Lieutenant Governor's office for filingEnrolled
    Governor Signed
  2. Mar 13, 2026Senate
    Senate/ to Governor
  3. Mar 13, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received enrolled bill from Printing
  4. Mar 12, 2026Senate
    Senate/ enrolled bill to Printing
  5. Mar 12, 2026Senate Secretary
    Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate
  6. Mar 10, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel / Enrolling
    Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared
Show 36 earlier actions
  1. Mar 10, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel / Enrolling
    Bill Received from Senate for Enrolling
  2. Mar 10, 2026Senate
    Senate/ signed by President/ sent for enrolling
  3. Mar 10, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received from House
  4. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ to Senate
  5. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ signed by Speaker/ returned to Senate
  6. Mar 6, 2026HouseFloor
    House/ passed 3rd reading
  7. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ uncircled
  8. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ circled
  9. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ 3rd reading
  10. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ Rules to 3rd Reading Calendar
  11. Mar 3, 2026House
    House/ 3rd Reading Calendar to Rules
  12. Mar 3, 2026House
    House/ 2nd reading
  13. Mar 3, 2026House
    House/ committee report favorable
  14. Mar 3, 2026House
    House Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  15. Mar 2, 2026HouseCommittee
    House/ to standing committee
  16. Mar 2, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  17. Mar 2, 2026House
    House/ received from Senate
  18. Mar 2, 2026Senate
    Senate/ to House
  19. Mar 2, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate/ passed 3rd reading
  20. Mar 2, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 3rd reading
  21. Feb 27, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate/ passed 2nd reading
  22. Feb 27, 2026Senate
    Senate/ floor amendment
  23. Feb 27, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 2nd reading
  24. Feb 25, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  25. Feb 25, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0310
  26. Feb 23, 2026Senate
    Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
  27. Feb 23, 2026Senate
    Senate/ committee report favorable
  28. Feb 23, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0310
  29. Feb 23, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  30. Feb 20, 2026SenateCommittee
    Senate/ to standing committee
  31. Feb 19, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  32. Feb 19, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received bill from Legislative Research
  33. Feb 19, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0310
  34. Feb 19, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0310
  35. Feb 19, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  36. Feb 19, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Establishment of Uniform Civil Remedies

Utah adopts uniform interstate statutory language to handle unauthorized disclosures of intimate images via civil courts.

Connected Entities

Michael K. McKell, Jordan D. Teuscher, Utah
PersonMichael K. McKell“Chief Sponsor of SB 310”Map →
PersonJordan D. Teuscher“House Sponsor of SB 310”Map →
locationUtah“Jurisdiction enacting the legislation”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record