POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Senate Hearing on 2019 Transportation Budget Proposal

Original title: TRANSPORTATION, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019

January 1, 2017

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing outlines potential federal funding shifts for national infrastructure projects, including proposed changes to cost-sharing for highway construction and the potential elimination of specific grant programs that support local roads, bridges, and rural air services.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

State and local governments

These entities would be required to cover a larger percentage of highway project costs if the proposed 20% federal cost-share cap is implemented.

Rural communities

These areas face potential service reductions due to proposed cuts to the Essential Air Service Program and Amtrak's Long Distance Routes.

Maritime Academy cadets

Cadets are affected by new funding for training vessels and programs intended to address sexual assault and harassment.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Subcommittee on Transportation, Housing and Urban Development held a hearing to review the President's 2019 budget request for the Department of Transportation. Senators expressed concerns regarding proposed funding cuts to infrastructure, transit, and rural programs, as well as the long-term insolvency of the .

Key Facts

  • The Administration requested $76.8 billion for the Department of Transportation for fiscal year 2019, down from $87.1 billion in 2018.
  • The budget proposes a $122 billion reduction in highway and transit formula programs over 10 years.
  • The proposed Incentives Grant Program would reduce the federal cost-share for highway projects from 80% to 20%.
  • The budget proposes eliminating the TIGER Competitive Grant Program.
  • The budget proposes reducing funding for the Essential Air Service Program and Amtrak's Long Distance Routes.
  • The budget proposes eliminating the Transit New Starts Project.
  • The budget proposes reducing funding for the Maritime Security Program.
  • The budget includes funding for a new Training Vessel Program and initiatives to address sexual assault at the Maritime Academy.
  • The budget includes a proposal to privatize the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).
  • The Highway Trust Fund faces ongoing insolvency, with $140 billion in general fund transfers required since 2008 to maintain operations.

Frequently Asked Questions

Will my local highway project cost more under the new proposal?
The proposed Incentives Grant Program would shift the federal cost-share from 80% to 20%, meaning state and local governments would be responsible for a significantly larger portion of project costs.
What is the status of the TIGER grant program?
The Administration's 2019 budget request proposes to eliminate the .
Is the FAA being privatized?
The budget request includes a proposal to privatize the FAA, though the Chairman noted reports suggesting the President may no longer support this move.

Why It Matters

The hearing outlines potential federal funding shifts for national infrastructure projects, including proposed changes to cost-sharing for highway construction and the potential elimination of specific grant programs that support local roads, bridges, and rural air services.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Shift in Federal Infrastructure Responsibility

The proposed budget indicates a significant shift toward 'devolution,' where the federal government reduces its cost-share burden, forcing states to raise their own revenue for infrastructure.

Connected Entities

personSusan M. CollinsChairman of the Subcommittee on AppropriationsMap →
organizationDepartment of TransportationFederal department under reviewMap →
personElaine L. ChaoSecretary of TransportationMap →
personJack ReedRanking Member of the SubcommitteeMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record