POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Utah Bill HB 497 Adjusts Minimum School Program Funding During Enrollment Declines

Original title: Public Education Funding Amendments

Last action · March 6, 2026: House/ filedSponsor: John Arthur

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Utah HB 497 requires the Office of the Legislative Fiscal Analyst to include additional funding in the Public Education Base Budget to offset projected reductions caused by student enrollment declines, starting July 1, 2026.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

public school students

Funding levels for their educational programs are adjusted based on changes in school district enrollment.

Directly affected

school districts

Base budget calculations and weighted pupil unit values are modified to account for drops in student headcounts.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens to school funding if student enrollment goes down?
Under HB 497, the fiscal analyst must include additional funding to increase the value of the , offsetting the projected reduction in s caused by the enrollment decline.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.

Procedural history

11 actions
  1. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ filed
  2. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ strike enacting clause
  3. Feb 10, 2026House
    House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  4. Feb 9, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0497
  5. Feb 9, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0497
  6. Feb 5, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
Show 5 earlier actions
  1. Feb 5, 2026House
    House/ received bill from Legislative Research
  2. Feb 5, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0497
  3. Feb 5, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0497
  4. Feb 5, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  5. Feb 5, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Executive Appropriations Committee, Governor's Office of Planning and Budget, Uniform School Fund and 3 more
OrganizationExecutive Appropriations Committee“Committee consulted regarding enrollment decline recommendations.”Map →
OrganizationGovernor's Office of Planning and Budget“Office consulted regarding enrollment decline recommendations.”Map →
OrganizationUniform School Fund“Fund providing appropriations for the Minimum School Program.”Map →
OrganizationMinimum School Program“State educational program receiving funding allocations.”Map →
OrganizationOffice of the Legislative Fiscal Analyst“Office responsible for preparing budget estimates and recommendations.”Map →
OrganizationPublic Education Economic Stabilization Restricted Account“Account providing appropriations to the Minimum School Program.”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record