Senate Hearing on Global Security Threats (2015)
January 1, 2016
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This hearing established the intelligence priorities and threat assessments that informed U.S. defense policy and budget planning for the 114th Congress.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
U.S. Department of Defense
The department's strategic priorities and budget requests are shaped by the threat assessments discussed in this hearing.
Senate Committee on Armed Services
The committee members use this testimony to inform legislative decisions on defense policy and appropriations.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on February 26, 2015, in the Dirksen Senate Office Building.
- The committee discussed the expansion of ISIL in Syria and Iraq and the threat of foreign fighters.
- The committee addressed Russia's military modernization and its actions in Eastern Ukraine.
- The committee reviewed China's military growth and land reclamation activities in the South China Sea.
- The committee examined Iran's influence in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Sudan, Yemen, Gaza, and Bahrain.
- Chairman McCain and Senator Reed agreed on a joint letter to the Budget Committee regarding defense funding.
- The committee noted North Korea's continued development of nuclear weapons and long-range ballistic missiles.
Why It Matters
This hearing established the intelligence priorities and threat assessments that informed U.S. defense policy and budget planning for the 114th Congress.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at this hearing?
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment20Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools