POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofEnergy →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Congressional Hearing on Alaska Onshore Oil and Gas Development

Original title: OVERSIGHT HEARING ON PROMOTING ONSHORE OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT IN ALASKA

Record date · January 1, 2017

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

The House Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources held an on July 18, 2017, to discuss strategies for increasing oil and gas production on onshore lands in Alaska. The session included testimony from industry representatives, labor union officials, and former government advisors.

Why it matters

This hearing serves as a formal record of legislative inquiry into federal policies governing energy extraction in Alaska, which directly impacts land use, regional economic activity, and national energy supply.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Alaska residents

Changes in onshore oil and gas development policies impact local employment, regional economic development, and land use.

Directly affected

Energy industry companies

Companies operating in Alaska are subject to federal regulations and leasing policies discussed during the hearing.

Directly affected

International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 959

Union members are involved in the labor force associated with oil and gas infrastructure and operations in Alaska.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on July 18, 2017, in the Longworth House Office Building.
  • The Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources convened to discuss promoting onshore oil and gas development in Alaska.
  • Opening statements were limited to the Chairman, Ranking Minority Member, and Vice Chair to expedite witness testimony.
  • Members were granted until 5:00 p.m. on the day of the hearing to submit additional opening statements for the official record.
Show all 5 facts
  • Witnesses included representatives from the International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 959, Arctic Slope Regional Corporation, ConocoPhillips Alaska, and a former Department of the Interior official.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to examine opportunities and policies related to promoting oil and gas development on onshore lands in Alaska.
Who testified at the hearing?
Testimony was provided by Gary Dixon (Teamsters Local 959), Richard Glenn (Arctic Slope Regional Corporation), Scott Jepsen (ConocoPhillips Alaska), and Pat Pourchot (former Interior Department official).

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Alaska Onshore Development

The hearing highlights a specific legislative focus on increasing onshore energy production in Alaska during the 115th Congress.

Connected Entities

Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources, Pat Pourchot, Richard Glenn and 4 more
OrganizationSubcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources“Congressional body conducting the hearing”Map →
PersonPat Pourchot“Former Special Assistant to the Secretary of the Interior for Alaska Affairs”Map →
PersonRichard Glenn“Executive Vice President, Arctic Slope Regional Corporation”Map →
PersonPaul A. Gosar“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources”Map →
PersonScott Jepsen“Vice President, ConocoPhillips Alaska”Map →
PersonGary Dixon“Vice President, International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 959 Alaska”Map →
PersonAlan S. Lowenthal“Ranking Democratic Member of the Subcommittee”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record